Management and outcomes of peptic ulcer disease in pregnancy

Purpose: Given the altered physiology of pregnancy, gastroenterologists are often reluctant to perform endoscopic procedures in pregnant women. The purpose of our study was to compare management practices and outcomes among pregnant and nonpregnant women admitted to the hospital for peptic ulcer disease (PUD). Materials and methods: A retrospective matched cohort study was carried out using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project - National Inpatient Sample from 1999 to 2015. A cohort of pregnant women with PUD was generated and compared with an age-matched cohort of nonpregnant women with PUD at a 1:5 ratio. Conditional logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the adjusted effect of PUD on variables and outcomes of interest, including associated conditions, management and treatment types, and complications. Results: PUD was diagnosed in 2535 pregnant women and 12,675 age-matched nonpregnant women during the 16-year study period. As compared with nonpregnant women, pregnant women with PUD were less likely to undergo diagnostic or therapeutic esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD) for this indication. Outcomes including fever, infection, sepsis, shock, and transfusion were less likely to occur in pregnant women as compared to nonpregnant women. Pregnant women also experienced shorter hospital stays. Pregnant women who underwent EGD were more likely to experience a venous thromboembolism than nonpregnant women. Conclusions: Pregnant women with PUD are less likely to undergo interventional diagnostic and therapeutic procedures than nonpregnant women with PUD. The reluctance to intervene in pregnancy does not appear to result in more adverse PUD-associated outcomes.