Evaluation of the efficacy of commercial protective cultures against mold and yeast in queso fresco

被引:14
|
作者
Makki, Ghadeer M. [1 ]
Kozak, Sarah M. [1 ]
Jencarelli, Katharine G. [1 ]
Alcaine, Samuel D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Food Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
queso fresco; protective culture; mold and yeast; biopreservative; LACTIC-ACID BACTERIA; LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES; ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY; CHEESE; STORAGE;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2020-18769
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of 3 commercial protective cultures designated PC1 (Lactobacillus spp.), PC2 (Lactobacillus rhamnosus), and PC3 (Lactobacillus rhamnosus) as biopreservatives in queso fresco (QF) against 9 yeast strains (Candida zeylanoides, Clavispora lusitaniae, Debaryomyces hansenii, Debaryomyces prosopidis, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Meyerozyma guilliermondii, Pichia fermentans, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, and Torulaspora delbrueckii) and 11 mold strains (uisperyillus cibarius, Aureobasidium pullulans, Penicillium chrysogenum, Penicillium citrinum, Penicillium commune, Penicillium decumbens, Penicillium roqueforti, Mucor genevensis, Mucor racemosus, Phoma dimorpha, and Trichoderma arnazonicum). All fungal spoilage strains were previously isolated from dairy processing environments. A positive control (C) with no protective culture was included. Fungal spoilage organisms were inoculated on cheese surfaces at an inoculum level of 20 cfu/g, and cheeses were stored at 6 +/- 2 degrees C throughout the study. For yeast enumeration, cheeses were sampled on d 0, 7, 14, and 21 postinoculation. Significant inhibition was detected for each yeast strain by comparing yeast counts for each cheese treated with protective culture against the control cheese using one-way ANOVA. with Bonferroni correction performed individually at d 7, 14, and 21 postinoculation. Mold growth was visually observed and imaged weekly through 70 d postinoculation. Whereas PC3 inhibited Cl. lusitaniae, Mey. guilliermondii, and Ph. dimorpha, PC2 inhibited the outgrowth of Cl. lusitaniae, D. luznsenii, and Ph. dimorpha. Protective culture 1 had the broadest spectrum of efficacy across yeast and molds, delaying spoilage caused by 4 distinct yeast strains (Cl. lusitaniae, D. hansenii, D. prosopidis, and Mey. guil- liertnondii), and inhibiting visible growth of 2 mold strains (P. chrysogenum and Ph. dimorpha). Results demonstrated that commercial protective cultures vary in performance, as indicated by the breadth of mold and yeast inhibition at both the genus and species level. This study suggests that manufacturers looking into using protective cultures should investigate their efficacy against specific fungal strains of concern.
引用
收藏
页码:9946 / 9957
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Preclinical evaluation of immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a recombinant chimeric protein vaccine against visceral leishmaniasis
    Lage, Daniela P.
    Vale, Danniele L.
    Maia, Fabiana A. G.
    Martins, Vivian T.
    Silva, Marcela G. P.
    Galvani, Nathalia C.
    Cardoso, Mariana M.
    Moreira, Gabriel J. L.
    Sombrio, Eduarda M.
    Freitas, Camila S.
    Pimenta, Breno L.
    Falcao, Karolina O. M.
    Dias, Saulo S. G.
    Bandeira, Raquel S.
    Pereira, Isabela A. G.
    Tavares, Grasiele S. V.
    Teixeira, Antonio L.
    Chavez-Fumagalli, Miguel A.
    Roatt, Bruno M.
    Machado-de-avila, Ricardo A.
    Coelho, Eduardo A. F.
    PARASITOLOGY, 2024,
  • [32] Evaluation in mice of the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a tetravalent subunit vaccine candidate against dengue virus
    Lazo, Laura
    Izquierdo, Alienys
    Suzarte, Edith
    Gil, Lazaro
    Valdes, Iris
    Marcos, Ernesto
    Alvarez, Mayling
    Romero, Yaremis
    Guadalupe Guzman, Maria
    Guillen, Gerardo
    Hermida Cruz, Lisset
    MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 58 (04) : 219 - 226
  • [33] Evaluation of In vitro and In vivo Protective Efficacy of Bauhinia variegata Against Leishmania donovani in Murine Model
    Kaur, Gurpreet
    Chauhan, Kalpana
    Anand, Namrata
    Kaur, Sukhbir
    ACTA PARASITOLOGICA, 2021, 66 (03) : 812 - 826
  • [34] Evaluation of the protective efficacy of novel vaccine candidates against Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogens
    Rezk, Nouran
    Cortazar, Julen Tomas
    Ma, Chaoying
    Jurado-Martin, Irene
    McClean, Siobhan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 54 : 1666 - 1666
  • [35] Evaluation of In vitro and In vivo Protective Efficacy of Bauhinia variegata Against Leishmania donovani in Murine Model
    Gurpreet Kaur
    Kalpana Chauhan
    Namrata Anand
    Sukhbir Kaur
    Acta Parasitologica, 2021, 66 : 812 - 826
  • [36] EVALUATING THE PROTECTIVE EFFICACY OF A LIVE AND TWO KILLED VACCINES AGAINST INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE IN COMMERCIAL CHICKS IN ZARIA, NIGERIA
    Angani, M. T.
    Abdu, P. A.
    Sa'idu, L.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2014, 2 (01): : 58 - 64
  • [37] Protective Efficacy of Commercial Newcastle Disease Vaccines Against Challenge of Goose Origin Virulent Newcastle Disease Virus in Geese
    Dai, Yabin
    Liu, Mei
    Li, Wenliang
    AVIAN DISEASES, 2008, 52 (03) : 467 - 471
  • [38] Evaluation of the efficacy of commercial sanitizers against adhered and planktonic cells of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp.
    Carballo, Julia
    Araujo, Ana-Belen
    CIENCIA E TECNOLOGIA DE ALIMENTOS, 2012, 32 (03): : 606 - 612
  • [39] Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of commercial and prototype PRRS subunit vaccines against an HP-PRRSV challenge
    Do Tien Duy
    Kim, Hanjin
    Jeong, Jiwoon
    Park, Kee Hwan
    Yang, Siyeon
    Oh, Taehwan
    Kim, Seeun
    Kang, Ikjae
    Chae, Chanhee
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 80 (09): : 1463 - 1467
  • [40] EVALUATION OF PROTECTIVE EFFICACY OF RECOMBINANT SUBUNIT VACCINES AGAINST SIMIAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS-INFECTION OF MACAQUES
    HU, SL
    ABRAMS, K
    MISHER, L
    STALLARD, V
    MORAN, P
    ZARLING, JM
    LANGLOIS, AJ
    KULLER, L
    MORTON, WR
    BENVENISTE, RE
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PRIMATOLOGY, 1992, 21 (2-3) : 119 - 125