The role of enhanced multi-detector-row computed tomography before urgent endoscopy in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

被引:19
|
作者
Miyaoka, Youichi [1 ]
Amano, Yuji [3 ]
Ueno, Sayaka [2 ]
Izumi, Daisuke [2 ]
Mikami, Hironobu [2 ]
Yazaki, Tomotaka [2 ]
Okimoto, Eiko [2 ]
Sonoyama, Takayuki [2 ]
Ito, Satoko [2 ]
Fujishiro, Hirofumi [1 ]
Kohge, Naruaki [2 ]
Imaoka, Tomonori [2 ]
机构
[1] Shimane Prefectural Cent Hosp, Div Endoscopy, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
[2] Shimane Prefectural Cent Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
[3] Int Univ Hlth & Welf, Kaken Hosp, Div Endoscopy, Ichikawa, Chiba 2720827, Japan
关键词
acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding; multi-detector-row computed tomography; urgent endoscopy; CT; LOCALIZATION;
D O I
10.1111/jgh.12447
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and AimMulti-detector-row computed tomography (MDCT) has been reported to be a potentially useful modality for detection of the bleeding origin in patients with acute upper massive gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of MDCT as a routine method for detecting the origin of acute upper GI bleeding prior to urgent endoscopy. MethodsFive hundred seventy-seven patients with acute upper GI bleeding (514 nonvariceal patients, 63 variceal patients) who underwent urgent upper GI endoscopy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups: enhanced MDCT, unenhanced MDCT, and no MDCT before endoscopy. The diagnostic accuracy of MDCT for detection of the bleeding origin was evaluated, and the average procedure times needed to endoscopically identify the bleeding origin were compared between groups. ResultsDiagnostic accuracy among endoscopists was 55.3% and 14.7% for the enhanced MDCT and unenhanced MDCT groups, respectively. Among nonvariceal patients, accuracy was 50.2% in the enhanced MDCT group, which was significantly better than that in the unenhanced MDCT group (16.5%). In variceal patients, accuracy was significantly better in the enhanced MDCT group (96.4%) than in the unenhanced MDCT group (0.0%). These accuracies were similar to those achieved by expert radiologists. The average procedure time to endoscopic detection of the bleeding origin in the enhanced MDCT group was significantly faster than that in the unenhanced MDCT and no-MDCT groups. ConclusionsEnhanced MDCT preceding urgent endoscopy may be an effective modality for the detection of bleeding origin in patients with acute upper GI bleeding.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 722
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Hepatocellular Carcinoma Presenting at Contrast-Enhanced Multi-Detector-Row Computed Tomography or Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Small (≤2 cm), Indeterminate Nodule: Growth Rate and Optimal Interval Time for Imaging Follow-Up
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Marin, Daniele
    Agnello, Francesco
    Di Martino, Michele
    Di Marco, Vito
    Lagalla, Roberto
    Catalano, Carlo
    Brancatelli, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2012, 36 (01) : 20 - 25
  • [22] Sufficient pulmonary vein image quality of non-enhanced multi-detector row computed tomography for pulmonary vein isolation by catheter ablation
    Yamaji, Hirosuke
    Hina, Kazuyoshi
    Kawamura, Hiroshi
    Murakami, Takashi
    Murakami, Masaaki
    Hirohata, Satoshi
    Ohmaru, Natsuki
    Kusachi, Shozo
    EUROPACE, 2012, 14 (01): : 52 - 59
  • [23] Evaluation of 64-Channel Contrast-Enhanced Multi-detector Row Computed Tomography for Preoperative N Staging in cT2-4 Gastric Carcinoma
    Ohashi, Masaki
    Morita, Shinji
    Fukagawa, Takeo
    Wada, Takeyuki
    Kushima, Ryoji
    Onaya, Hiroaki
    Katai, Hitoshi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (01) : 165 - 171
  • [24] Comparison of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging versus Four-phase Multi-detector Row Computed Tomography in Assessing Tumor Regression after Radiofrequency Ablation in Subjects with Hepatocellular Carcinomas
    Yoon, Jung-Hee
    Lee, Eun-Joo
    Cha, Seong-Sook
    Han, Sang-Suk
    Choi, Suk-Jin
    Juhn, Jae-Ryang
    Kim, Myung-Hee
    Lee, Yeon-Jae
    Park, Seong-Jae
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (03) : 348 - 356