Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): Surgical Technique, Long-Term 4-year Prospective Outcomes, and Complications Compared with an Open TLIF Cohort

被引：110

作者：

Wong, Albert P. ^{[1
]}

Smith, Zachary A. ^{[1
]}

Stadler, James A., III ^{[1
]}

Hu, Xue Yu ^{[2
]}

Yan, Jia Zhi ^{[3
]}

Li, Xin Feng ^{[4
]}

Lee, Ji Hyun ^{[5
]}

Khoo, Larry I. ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA

[2] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Xijing Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Xian 710032, Shaanxi, Peoples R China

[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China

[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Renji Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Shanghai 200127, Peoples R China

[5] Univ So Calif, Good Samaritan Hosp, Spine Clin Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90117 USA

来源：

NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA | 2014年 / 25卷 / 02期

关键词：

TLIF; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Minimally invasive surgery; Minimally invasive spine; Spine surgery outcomes; TLIF complications; PEDICLE SCREW; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RADIOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; OPEN SURGERY; SPINE; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SYSTEM; INSTRUMENTATION; FEASIBILITY;

D O I：

10.1016/j.nec.2013.12.007

中图分类号：

R74 [神经病学与精神病学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is an important surgical option for the treatment of back pain and radiculopathy. The minimally invasive TLIF (MI-TLIF) technique is increasingly used to achieve neural element decompression, restoration of segmental alignment and lordosis, and bony fusion. This article reviews the surgical technique, outcomes, and complications in a series of 144 consecutive 1- and 2-level MI-TLIFs in comparison with an institutional control group of 54 open traditional TLIF procedures with a mean of 46 months' follow-up. The evidence base suggests that MI-TLIF can be performed safely with excellent long-term outcomes.

引用

页码：279 / +

页数：27

共 66 条

[1] Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion 2-year Assessment of Narcotic Use, Return to Work, Disability, and Quality of Life [J].

Adogwa, Owoicho ;

Parker, Scott L. ;

Bydon, Ali ;

Cheng, Joseph ;

McGirt, Matthew J. .

JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2011, 24 (08) :479-484

[2]

[Anonymous], J SPINAL DISORD TECH

[3]

[Anonymous], WORLD NEUROSURG

[4] Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis [J].

Archavlis, Eleftherios ;

Carvi y Nievas, Mario .

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (08) :1731-1740

[5] Minimally invasive operative management for lumbar spinal stenosis: Overview of early and long-term outcomes [J].

Asgarzadie, Farbod ;

Khoo, Larry T. .

ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 38 (03) :387-+

[6]

Beringer Will F, 2006, Neurosurg Focus, V20, pE4

[7]

Brantigan John W, 2004, Spine J, V4, P681, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.253

[8] Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F Cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system - Two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial [J].

Brantigan, JW ;

Steffee, AD ;

Lewis, ML ;

Quinn, LM ;

Persenaire, JM .

SPINE, 2000, 25 (11) :1437-1446

[9]

Deutsch Harel, 2006, Neurosurg Focus, V20, pE10

[10] Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up [J].

Dhall, Sanjay S. ;

Wang, Michael Y. ;

Mummaneni, Praveen V. .

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 9 (06) :560-565

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →