Qualitative study of the influence of horse-owner relationship during some key events within a horse's lifetime

被引:15
作者
Clough, Harriet [1 ]
Roshier, Mandy [1 ]
England, Gary [1 ]
Burford, John [1 ]
Freeman, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Vet Med & Sci, Coll Rd, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leics, England
关键词
decision-making; euthanasia; horse owner; interview; purchase; thematic analysis; DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS; PERSONALITY; EUTHANASIA;
D O I
10.1002/vetr.79
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Background: There is a lack of research exploring how the horse-human relationship influences horse owners' decision-making. The aim of this study was to investigate how an owner's relationship with their horse affects decisions around key events during their horse's lifetime. Methods: An online survey and semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with horse-owners. The online survey asked horse owners about their experiences of decision-making and their relationship with their horse and identified interview participants. Two semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 horse owners on their experience of purchasing and euthanasia of horses. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed. Results: There were 938 responses to the online survey. The majority of owners considered their horse to be a member of the family (92.9%, 808/870). The mean amount spent annually on their horse was 9215 pound (range 324-14,240) pound. Seven themes were identified in the interviews including mismatching of horse and rider; financial, time, welfare and personal obligations involved in horse ownership; shared-decision making; the horse's quality of life; guilt and responsibility grief surrounding euthanasia decisions. Conclusion: This study highlighted the strong owner-horse relationship, the significant obligations involved in horse ownership and the emotional impact of euthanasia decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Predictors of owner response to companion animal death in 177 clients from 14 practices in Ontario [J].
Adams, CL ;
Bonnett, BN ;
Meek, AH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 217 (09) :1303-1309
[2]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[3]   Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples [J].
Campbell, Steve ;
Greenwood, Melanie ;
Prior, Sarah ;
Shearer, Toniele ;
Walkem, Kerrie ;
Young, Sarah ;
Bywaters, Danielle ;
Walker, Kim .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2020, 25 (08) :652-661
[4]  
Charles N., 2011, Human and Other Animals, P69, DOI DOI 10.1057/9780230321366_4
[5]   Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review [J].
Chewning, Betty ;
Bylund, Carma L. ;
Shah, Bupendra ;
Arora, Neeraj K. ;
Gueguen, Jennifer A. ;
Makoul, Gregory .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2012, 86 (01) :9-18
[6]  
Clough H. G. R., 2019, Veterinary Evidence, V4, DOI 10.18849/VE.V4I4.240
[7]  
Cookson S, 2017, EQUINE HLTH, V2017, P46
[8]   Client-veterinarian communication: Skills for client centered dialogue and shared decision making [J].
Cornell, Karen K. ;
Kopcha, Michelle .
VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2007, 37 (01) :37-+
[9]   "She's a dog at the end of the day": Guide dog owners' perspectives on the behaviour of their guide dog [J].
Craigon, Peter J. ;
Hobson-West, Pru ;
England, Gary C. W. ;
Whelan, Chantelle ;
Lethbridge, Emma ;
Asher, Lucy .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (04)
[10]  
Dawson SE, 2007, COMPANION ANIMAL EUT