Resource interaction and resource integration: Similarities, differences, reflections

被引:45
作者
Bocconcelli, Roberta [1 ]
Carlborg, Per [2 ]
Harrison, Debbie [3 ]
Hasche, Nina [2 ]
Hedvall, Klas [4 ]
Huang, Lei [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Urbino, Dept Econ, Polit, Soc, Urbino, Italy
[2] Orebro Univ, Sch Business, Orebro, Sweden
[3] BI Norwegian Business Sch, Dept Strategy & Entrepreneurship, Oslo, Norway
[4] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Technol Management & Econ, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Stockholm Sch Econ, Dept Mkt & Strategy, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Resource interaction; Resource integration; IMP; SDL; Business networks; Ecosystems; SERVICE-DOMINANT LOGIC; NETWORKS; PARADIGM; BUSINESS; CREATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.09.016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to provide a state-of-the-art comparison of the conceptualization of resources in 'Resource Interaction' (IMP) and 'Resource Integration' (SDL). Both are engaged with understanding how value is (co)-created, but with different emphases. Existing comparisons are limited and out of date. We trace how each has evolved over time by analyzing key developments. The focus of SDL has shifted from operant resources towards resource integration, and from a dyadic view towards ecosystem contexts. Within IMP, research takes a network perspective in investigating the nature of resource interaction in a variety of empirical contexts. An analysis of similarities and differences highlights key assumptions, the classification of resources, and the role for the actor. The comparison offers a thorough understanding of Resource Interaction and Resource Integration. The paper concludes by proposing suggestions for further research for Resource Interaction.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 396
页数:12
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Re-appraising interaction and process for industrial network research: The future plunging mirror hall metaphor [J].
Andersen, Poul Houman ;
Medlin, Christopher John ;
Tornroos, Jan-Ake .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 91 :627-638
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Resourcing in logistics. The art of systematic combining
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Journal of Managerial Psychology
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Management Decision
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, THESIS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1798, ESSAY PRINCIPLE POPU
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1994, UNDERSTING RESOUR
[8]   Charting the reach and contribution of IMP literature in other disciplines: A bibliometric analysis [J].
Aramo-Immonen, Heli ;
Carlborg, Per ;
Hasche, Nina ;
Jussila, Jari ;
Kask, Johan ;
Linton, Gabriel ;
Mustafee, Navonil ;
Oberg, Christina .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 87 :47-62
[9]   Information technology at IKEA: an "open sesame" solution or just another type of facility? [J].
Baraldi, E ;
Waluszewski, A .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2005, 58 (09) :1251-1260
[10]  
Baraldi E., 2003, THESIS UPPSALA U SWE