Spatial Assessment of the Effects of Land Cover Change on Soil Erosion in Hungary from 1990 to 2018

被引:16
作者
Waltner, Istvan [1 ]
Saeidi, Sahar [1 ]
Grosz, Janos [1 ]
Centeri, Csaba [1 ]
Laborczi, Annamaria [1 ]
Pasztor, Laszlo [1 ]
机构
[1] Szent Istvan Univ, Fac Agr & Environm Sci, H-2100 Godollo, Hungary
关键词
PESERA; USLE; soil erosion; Hungary; land use and land cover; CORINE Land Cover; Random Forest; RIVER-BASIN; PESERA; CATCHMENT; IMPACT; MODEL; RUSLE; CLASSIFICATION; SENSITIVITY; WILDFIRE; EUROPE;
D O I
10.3390/ijgi9110667
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As soil erosion is still a global threat to soil resources, the estimation of soil loss, particularly at a spatiotemporal setting, is still an existing challenge. The primary aim of our study is the assessment of changes in soil erosion potential in Hungary from 1990 to 2018, induced by the changes in land use and land cover based on CORINE Land Cover data. The modeling scheme included the application and cross-valuation of two internationally applied methods, the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and the Pan-European Soil Erosion Risk Assessment (PESERA) models. Results indicate that the changes in land cover resulted in a general reduction in predicted erosion rates, by up to 0.28 t/ha/year on average. Analysis has also revealed that the combined application of the two models has reduced the occurrence of extreme predictions, thus, increasing the robustness of the method. Random Forest regression analysis has revealed that the differences between the two models are mainly driven by their sensitivity to slope and land cover, followed by soil parameters. The resulting spatial predictions can be readily applied for qualitative spatial analysis. However, the question of extreme predictions still indicates that quantitative use of the output results should only be carried out with sufficient care.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Effects of dynamic land use/land cover change on water resources and sediment yield in the Anzali wetland catchment, Gilan, Iran
    Aghsaei, Helen
    Dinan, Naghmeh Mobarghaee
    Moridi, Ali
    Asadolahi, Zahra
    Delavar, Majid
    Fohrer, Nicola
    Wagner, Paul Daniel
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 712 (712)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1990, EPIC EROSION PRODUCT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, WATER SUI, DOI DOI 10.3390/W11102059
  • [4] Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures
    Archer, Kelfie J.
    Kirnes, Ryan V.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2008, 52 (04) : 2249 - 2260
  • [5] Sensitivity of the PESERA soil erosion model to terrain and soil inputs
    Baggaley, Nikki
    Potts, Jacqueline
    [J]. GEODERMA REGIONAL, 2017, 11 : 104 - 112
  • [6] Bartus M., 2019, Agrokemia es Talajtan, V68, P225, DOI 10.1556/0088.2019.00046
  • [7] Bashfield A, 2011, 34 INT S REM SENS EN, P10
  • [8] On the evaluation of soil erosion models: Are we doing enough?
    Batista, Pedro V. G.
    Davies, Jessica
    Silva, Marx L. N.
    Quinton, John N.
    [J]. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2019, 197
  • [9] Bihari Z., 2018, NATL ATLAS HUNGARY N, P58