Evaluation of Patient Treatment Preferences for 15 to 20 mm Kidney Stones: A Conjoint Analysis

被引:8
作者
Spradling, Kyle [1 ]
Bhambhvani, Hriday P. [1 ]
Chang, Timothy [1 ,2 ]
Pao, Alan C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liao, Joseph [1 ,2 ]
Leppert, John T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Welk, Blayne [4 ]
Harris, Catherine R. [1 ,5 ]
Conti, Simon L. [1 ]
Elliott, Christopher S. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, 300 Pasteur Dr MC 5118, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Palo Alto, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Nephrol, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Western Univ, Dept Surg, London, ON, Canada
[5] Santa Clara Valley Med Ctr, Div Urol, San Jose, CA 95128 USA
关键词
kidney calculi; decision support techniques; ureteroscopy; nephrolithotomy; percutaneous; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; POLE RENAL STONES; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; CALCULI;
D O I
10.1089/end.2020.0370
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objective: Ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are standard treatments for intermediate-size (15-20 mm) kidney stones but differ in their postoperative recovery, stone-free rates, and complication risks. We aimed to evaluate what affects patient treatment preferences. Methods: Patients with urinary stone disease completed a choice-based conjoint analysis exercise assessing four treatment attributes associated with URS and PCNL. A sensitivity analysis using a market simulator was performed, and the relative importance of each attribute was calculated. Differences in treatment preferences by demographic subgroup were assessed. Results: A total of 58 patients completed the conjoint analysis exercise. Stone-free rate was the most important treatment attribute, while the length of hospital stay and cosmesis were less important. Overall, sensitivity analysis based on market simulation scenarios predicted an almost equal preference for URS (52.4%) compared with PCNL (47.6%) for treatment of an intermediate-size stone. Older patients (>65 years old) expressed their stronger preferences for lower infection rates and shorter hospital stays, and were more likely to prefer URS (67.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 52% to 82.5%) compared with younger patients (20-34 years old) (20.3%, 95% CI: 0% to 41.5%) who preferred higher procedure success rates and fewer repeat procedures. Conclusion: Conjoint analysis predicts nearly equal patient preference for URS or PCNL for the treatment of intermediate-size kidney stones. Older patients prefer the lower urinary tract infection risk and shorter hospital stay associated with URS, while younger patients prefer higher stone-free rates associated with PCNL. These results can help guide urologists in counseling patients and improve the shared decision-making process.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / 711
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Lower Pole Midsize (1-2 cm) Calyceal Stones: Outcome Analysis of 56 Cases [J].
Aboutaleb, H. ;
El-Shazly, M. ;
Eldin, M. Badr .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2012, 89 (03) :348-354
[2]   Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Lower-Pole Renal Stones with a Diameter of 15 to 20 mm [J].
Bozkurt, Omer F. ;
Resorlu, Berkan ;
Yildiz, Yildiray ;
Can, Ceren E. ;
Unsal, Ali .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (07) :1131-1135
[3]   Patients' preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A conjoint analysis [J].
Bridges, John F. P. ;
Mohamed, Ateesha F. ;
Finnern, Henrik W. ;
Woehl, Anette ;
Hauber, A. Brett .
LUNG CANCER, 2012, 77 (01) :224-231
[4]   Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis [J].
Chung, Doo Yong ;
Kang, Dong Hyuk ;
Cho, Kang Su ;
Jeong, Won Sik ;
Jung, Hae Do ;
Kwon, Jong Kyou ;
Lee, Seon Heui ;
Lee, Joo Yong .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (02)
[5]   Categorisation of Complications and Validation of the Clavien Score for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy [J].
de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H. ;
Opondo, Dedan ;
Daels, Francisco P. J. ;
Giusti, Guido ;
Serrano, Alvaro ;
Kandasami, Sangam V. ;
Wolf, J. Stuart, Jr. ;
Grabe, Magnus ;
Gravas, Stavros .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (02) :246-255
[6]   Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
De, Shuba ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Kim, Fernando J. ;
Zargar, Homayoun ;
Laydner, Humberto ;
Balsamo, Raffaele ;
Torricelli, Fabio C. ;
Di Palma, Carmine ;
Molina, Wilson R. ;
Monga, Manoj ;
De Sio, Marco .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (01) :125-137
[7]   Postoperative Infection Rates in Low Risk Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With and Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis: A Matched Case Control Study [J].
Gravas, Stavros ;
Montanari, Emanuele ;
Geavlete, Petrisor ;
Onal, Bulent ;
Skolarikos, Andreas ;
Pearle, Margaret ;
Sun, Ying Hao ;
de la Rosette, Jean .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (03) :843-847
[8]   Understanding patients' preferences for surgical management of urethral stricture disease [J].
Hampson, Lindsay A. ;
Lin, Tracy K. ;
Wilson, Leslie ;
Allen, Isabel E. ;
Gaither, Thomas W. ;
Breyer, Benjamin N. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (11) :1799-1805
[9]   Patient-centered Treatment Decisions for Urethral Stricture: Conjoint Analysis Improves Surgical Decision-making [J].
Hampson, Lindsay A. ;
Allen, Isabel E. ;
Gaither, Thomas W. ;
Lin, Tracy ;
Ting, Jie ;
Osterberg, E. Charles ;
Wilson, Leslie ;
Breyer, Benjamin N. .
UROLOGY, 2017, 99 :246-251
[10]  
Junbo Liu, 2019, Urol J, V16, P97, DOI 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4681