The Effect of Physical and Hydraulic Properties of Peatmoss and Pumice on Douglas Fir Bark Based Soilless Substrates

被引:23
作者
Gabriel, Magdalena Zazirska [2 ]
Altland, James E. [1 ]
Owen, James S., Jr. [3 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Applicat Technol Res Unit, Ohio Agr Res & Dev Ctr, Wooster, OH 44691 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, N Willamette Res & Extens Ctr, Aurora, OR 97002 USA
关键词
moisture characteristic curves; container capacity; air space; particle size distribution; available water; water-buffering capacity; MEDIA; MIXTURES;
D O I
10.21273/HORTSCI.44.3.874
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Douglas fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii Mirb. (Franco)] bark (DFB), sphagnum peatmoss, and pumice are the most common substrate components used in the Oregon nursery industry. The objective of this study was to document the effect of peat and pumice addition on the physical and hydrological properties of DFB soilless substrates. A secondary objective was to determine if measured properties of mixed soilless substrates can be accurately predicted from the known properties of the individual components. Treatment design was a 3 x 3 factorial with three rates each of sphagnum peatmoss and pumice (0%, 15%, and 30% by vol.) added to DFB. The resulting nine substrates were measured for total porosity, air space, container capacity, and bulk density using porometers. Moisture characteristic curves were generated by measuring water content along a continuous column. Adding pumice to DFB decreased total porosity, container capacity, available water, and water-buffering capacity but increased bulk density. Adding peatmoss to DFB increased total porosity, container capacity, and available water but decreased air space and bulk density. Comparison of predicted values against measured values indicated that bulk density could be predicted reliably; however, all other physical properties could not be accurately predicted.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 878
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES OF NURSERY POTTING-MIXTURES [J].
BEARDSELL, DV ;
NICHOLS, DG ;
JONES, DL .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 1979, 11 (01) :1-8
[2]   Healthy substrates need physicals too! [J].
Bilderback, TE ;
Warren, SL ;
Owen, JS ;
Albano, JP .
HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2005, 15 (04) :747-751
[3]   Grouping and comparison of container substrates based on physical properties using exploratory multivariate statistical methods [J].
Blythe, Eugene K. ;
Merhaut, Donald J. .
HORTSCIENCE, 2007, 42 (02) :353-363
[4]  
Boodt M. de, 1972, Acta Horticulturae, P37
[5]  
Breedlove D., 1999, P SO NURS ASS RES C, V44, P71
[6]  
Buamscha G, 2005, DIGGER, V49, P18
[7]   Chemical and physical properties of Douglas fir bark relevant to the production of container plants [J].
Buamscha, M. Gabriela ;
Altland, James E. ;
Sullivan, Dan M. ;
Horneck, Donald A. ;
Cassidy, James .
HORTSCIENCE, 2007, 42 (05) :1281-1286
[8]  
Fonteno W.C., 1996, WATER MEDIA NUTR GRE, P93
[9]   IMPACT OF HYDROGEL ON PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES OF COARSE-STRUCTURED HORTICULTURAL SUBSTRATES [J].
FONTENO, WC ;
BILDERBACK, TE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1993, 118 (02) :217-222
[10]   Particle size and hydraulic properties of pumice affect growth and yield of greenhouse crops in soilless culture [J].
Gizas, George ;
Savvas, Dimitrios .
HORTSCIENCE, 2007, 42 (05) :1274-1280