Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art

被引:182
作者
Stradiotti, P. [1 ]
Curti, A. [1 ]
Castellazzi, G. [1 ]
Zerbi, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Galeazzi, I-20161 Milan, Italy
关键词
CT; MRI; Artifacts; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS; ORTHOPEDIC HARDWARE; IMAGING PARAMETERS; REDUCTION; IMPLANTS; ECHO; SCREWS; OSTEOSYNTHESIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-009-0998-5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The projectional nature of radiogram limits its amount of information about the instrumented spine. MRI and CT imaging can be more helpful, using cross-sectional view. However, the presence of metal-related artifacts at both conventional CT and MRI imaging can obscure relevant anatomy and disease. We reviewed the literature about overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopaedic implants at high-field strength MRI imaging and multi-detector CT. The evolution of multichannel CT has made available new techniques that can help minimizing the severe beam-hardening artifacts. The presence of artifacts at CT from metal hardware is related to image reconstruction algorithm (filter), tube current (in mA), X-ray kilovolt peak, pitch, hardware composition, geometry (shape), and location. MRI imaging has been used safely in patients with orthopaedic metallic implants because most of these implants do not have ferromagnetic properties and have been fixed into position. However, on MRI imaging metallic implants may produce geometric distortion, the so-called susceptibility artifact. In conclusion, although 140 kV and high milliamperage second exposures are recommended for imaging patients with hardware, caution should always be exercised, particularly in children, young adults, and patients undergoing multiple examinations. MRI artifacts can be minimized by positioning optimally and correctly the examined anatomy part with metallic implants in the magnet and by choosing fast spin-echo sequences, and in some cases also STIR sequences, with an anterior to posterior frequency-encoding direction and the smallest voxel size.
引用
收藏
页码:S102 / S108
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS IN 2DFT SPIN-ECHO AND GRADIENT-ECHO IMAGING - THE CYLINDER MODEL REVISITED [J].
BAKKER, CJG ;
BHAGWANDIEN, R ;
MOERLAND, MA ;
FUDERER, M .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1993, 11 (04) :539-548
[2]   Artifacts in CT: Recognition and avoidance [J].
Barrett, JF ;
Keat, N .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2004, 24 (06) :1679-1691
[3]  
Czerny C, 1999, Top Magn Reson Imaging, V10, P214, DOI 10.1097/00002142-199908000-00003
[4]   Multichannel CT: Evaluating the spine in postoperative patients with orthopedic hardware [J].
Douglas-Akinwande, Annette C. ;
Buckwalter, Kenneth A. ;
Rydberg, Jonas ;
Rankin, James L. ;
Choplin, Robert H. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2006, 26 :S97-U107
[5]   Internally stabilized spine: Optimal choice of frequency-encoding gradient direction during MR imaging minimizes susceptibility artifact from titanium vertebral body screws [J].
Frazzini, VI ;
Kagetsu, NJ ;
Johnson, CE ;
Destian, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 204 (01) :268-272
[6]   MRI susceptibility artefacts related to scaphoid screws: Te effect of screw type, screw orientation and imaging parameters [J].
Ganapathi, M ;
Joseph, G ;
Savage, R ;
Jones, AR ;
Timms, B ;
Lyons, K .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2002, 27B (02) :165-170
[7]   Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: Effects of main field orientation and strength [J].
Guermazi, A ;
Miaux, Y ;
Zaim, S ;
Peterfy, CG ;
White, D ;
Genant, HK .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 58 (04) :322-328
[8]   CT SCANS THROUGH METAL SCANNING TECHNIQUE VERSUS HARDWARE COMPOSITION [J].
HARAMATI, N ;
STARON, RB ;
MAZELSPERLING, K ;
FREEMAN, K ;
NICKOLOFF, EL ;
BARAX, C ;
FELDMAN, F .
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 1994, 18 (06) :429-434
[9]   Metal artifact reduction in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Harris, Craig A. ;
White, Lawrence M. .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 37 (03) :349-+
[10]  
HASSFELD S, 2005, MAGMA, V18, P103