F-wave latency and F-wave conduction velocity for the tibial nerve in clinically normal dogs

被引:7
作者
Okuno, S
Kobayashi, T
Orito, K
机构
[1] Anim Clin Kobayashi, Fukaya, Saitama 3660813, Japan
[2] Azabu Univ, Sch Vet Med, Dept Vet Pharmacol, Kanagawa 2298501, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.1262
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objective-To establish a method of F-wave examinations and to determine values of F-wave conduction velocity (FWCV) and F-wave latency for the tibial nerve of clinically normal dogs. Animals-21 clinically normal dogs. Procedure-The F-waves were elicited from the interosseous muscles via stimulation of the tibial nerve. The FWCV was determined by using the F wave shortest value and the surface distance corresponding to the tibial nerve length. Correlation between the smallest latency value of the F-wave and the length of the tibial nerve and between the FWCV and rectal temperature were closely examined. Results-F-wave latency was proportional to the length of the tibial nerve (correlation coefficient, 0.929). Mean +/- SD FWCV was 7798 +/- 8.62 m/s. Regression equation was as follows: F-wave latency = 2.799 + (0.029 x length of the tibial nerve). The FWCV was increased when the measured rectal temperature was high. Correlation coefficient between FWCV and rectal temperature was 0.665. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-In the study reported here, we established a reliable method for clinical evaluation of the F-wave. When assessing nerve conduction velocity, it is essential to measure nerve length along the pathway that the nerve impulse travels. This method of F-wave examination is a useful diagnostic tool for the evaluation of suspected dysfunction of the peripheral nervous system.
引用
收藏
页码:1262 / 1264
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] AN ACCURATE MEASURE OF F-WAVE LATENCY VARIABILITY AND ELICITABILITY IN NORMAL SUBJECTS
    EISEN, A
    HOIRCH, M
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 57 (05): : P88 - P88
  • [32] F-WAVE LATENCY IN DISORDERS OF THE LOWER MOTOR NEURON
    STONE, LA
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1983, 63 (05): : 759 - 759
  • [33] Comparison of automated and manual F-wave latency measurements
    Fisher, MA
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 116 (02) : 264 - 269
  • [34] F-WAVE LATENCY AND THE CARPAL-TUNNEL SYNDROME
    HUGHES, ACR
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 49 (1-2): : P18 - P18
  • [35] Relative diagnostic utility of F-wave latency parameters
    Megerian, J. T.
    Kong, X.
    Gozani, S. N.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2006, 34 (04) : 539 - 539
  • [36] Reference Value of F-Wave Latency in the Facial Nerve Based on Human Subjects
    Li, Ping
    Liu, Yang
    Wu, Tingting
    Qiao, Hui
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 32 (01) : 75 - 78
  • [37] ULNAR F-WAVE CONDUCTION-VELOCITY IN EPIDURAL METASTATIC ROOT LESIONS
    DEVISSER, BWO
    VANDERSANDE, JJ
    KEMP, B
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1982, 11 (02) : 142 - 146
  • [38] F-WAVE DETERMINATION IN POLYNEUROPATHIES
    KIMURA, J
    SHIVAPOUR, E
    YAMADA, T
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1981, 52 (03): : S100 - S100
  • [39] VARIABILITY OF F-WAVE SHAPE
    KOMORI, T
    HIROSE, K
    TSUBAKI, T
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 67 (03): : P72 - P72
  • [40] ARE F-WAVE RESPONSES RANDOM
    PETAJAN, JH
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 1983, 6 (07) : 536 - 536