Laparoscopic treatment of rectal prolapse:: experience gained in a prospective multicenter study

被引:27
作者
Rose, J
Schneider, C
Scheidbach, H
Yildirim, C
Bruch, HP
Konradt, J
Bärlehner, E
Köckerling, F
机构
[1] Hanover Hosp, Dept Surg, D-30449 Hannover, Germany
[2] Hanover Hosp, Ctr Minimally Invas Surg, D-30449 Hannover, Germany
关键词
rectal prolapse; laparoscopic colorectal surgery; multicenter study;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-002-0305-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We report the findings of a prospective multicenter observational study carried out by the Study Group for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery on patients undergoing laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal prolapse. The study investigated the safety of various laparoscopic techniques in terms of perioperative and postoperative general and technique-specific complications and compared the results with those reported for open surgery in this area. Methods: Of the 150 patients undergoing laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery for rectal prolapse 124 received rectopexy combined with resection and 26 rectopexy alone. In 85 patients a mesh was employed during rectopexy. The conversion rate was 5.3%. Results: Perioperative complications (21 surgical and 35 general perioperative) were recorded in 37 patients (24.7%). The reoperation rate was 5.3% (bleeding 2, anastomotic leak 2, ileus 4). No procedure-specific perioperative complications were observed. In particular, reduced surgical trauma led to fewer severe postoperative complications such as cardiopulmonary problems (3.3%). Conclusions: The techniques of conventional prolapse surgery can readily be translated to the laparoscopic modality, since oncological criteria do not have to be considered. The usually elderly patients in this group benefit to a particular degree from the known advantages associated with reduced surgical trauma. Perioperative morbidity is determined largely by the surgeon's experience. We therefore believe that rectal prolapse is a suitable indication for the minimally invasive modality in the hands of trained surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 137
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Laparoscopic colorectal surgery - Do we get faster? [J].
Agachan, F ;
Joe, JS ;
Sher, M ;
Weiss, EG ;
Nogueras, JJ ;
Wexner, SD .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (04) :331-335
[2]  
ATHANASIADIS S, 1995, CHIRURG, V66, P27
[3]   LAPAROSCOPIC-ASSISTED VS OPEN RESECTION - RECTOPEXY OFFERS EXCELLENT RESULTS [J].
BAKER, R ;
SENAGORE, AJ ;
LUCHTEFELD, MA .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1995, 38 (02) :199-201
[4]   Comparison of laparoscopic rectopexy with open technique in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse - Clinical and functional results [J].
Boccasanta, P ;
Rosati, R ;
Venturi, M ;
Montorsi, M ;
Cioffi, U ;
De Simone, M ;
Strinna, M ;
Peracchia, A .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 8 (06) :460-465
[5]   Laparoscopic resection of the colon and rectum for cancer [J].
Bokey, EL ;
Moore, JWE ;
Keating, JP ;
Zelas, P ;
Chapuis, PH ;
Newland, RC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 84 (06) :822-825
[6]  
Bruch HP, 1999, DIS COLON RECTUM, V42, P1189, DOI 10.1007/BF02238572
[8]  
CORMAN ML, 1988, SURG CLIN N AM, V68, P1255
[9]  
CUESTA MA, 1993, SURG LAPAROSC ENDOSC, V3, P456
[10]   LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTHESIS FIXATION RECTOPEXY FOR COMPLETE RECTAL PROLAPSE [J].
CUSCHIERI, A ;
SHIMI, SM ;
VANDERVELPEN, G ;
BANTING, S ;
WOOD, RAB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (01) :138-139