Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults

被引:98
作者
Demicheli, Vittorio [1 ]
Jefferson, Tom [2 ]
Al-Ansary, Lubna A. [3 ]
Ferroni, Eliana [4 ]
Rivetti, Alessandro [1 ]
Di Pietrantonj, Carlo [1 ]
机构
[1] Azienda Sanitaria Locale ASL AL, SSEpi SeREMI Cochrane Vaccines Field, Serv Reg Riferimento Epidemiol, I-15121 Alessandria, Piemonte, Italy
[2] Cochrane Collaborat, Rome, Italy
[3] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Dept Family & Community Med, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia
[4] Lazio Reg Hlth Serv, Dept Epidemiol, Rome, Italy
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2014年 / 03期
关键词
Drug Industry; Influenza A virus; Influenza B virus; Influenza Vaccines [adverse effects; therapeutic use; Influenza; Human; prevention; control; virology; Publication Bias; Research Support as Topic; Adult; Humans; GUILLAIN-BARRE-SYNDROME; RESEARCH-COUNCIL-COMMITTEE; HONG-KONG INFLUENZA; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESISTANT INTRANASAL INFLUENZA; EVENTS FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION; OCULO-RESPIRATORY SYNDROME; POPULATION-BASED COHORT; SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS; 2009; H1N1; VACCINE;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Different types of influenza vaccines are currently produced worldwide. Vaccination of pregnant women is recommended internationally, while healthy adults are targeted in North America. Objectives To identify, retrieve and assess all studies evaluating the effects (efficacy, effectiveness and harm) of vaccines against influenza in healthy adults, including pregnant women. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 2), MEDLINE (January 1966 to May 2013) and EMBASE (1990 to May 2013). Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing influenza vaccines with placebo or no intervention in naturally occurring influenza in healthy individuals aged 16 to 65 years. We also included comparative studies assessing serious and rare harms. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Main results We included 90 reports containing 116 data sets; among these 69 were clinical trials of over 70,000 people, 27 were comparative cohort studies (about eight million people) and 20 were case-control studies (nearly 25,000 people). We retrieved 23 reports of the effectiveness and safety of vaccine administration in pregnant women (about 1.6 million mother-child couples). The overall effectiveness of parenteral inactivated vaccine against influenza-like illness (ILI) is limited, corresponding to a number needed to vaccinate (NNV) of 40 (95% confidence interval (CI) 26 to 128). The overall efficacy of inactivated vaccines in preventing confirmed influenza has a NNV of 71 (95% CI 64 to 80). The difference between these two values depends on the different incidence of ILI and confirmed influenza among the study populations: 15.6% of unvaccinated participants versus 9.9% of vaccinated participants developed ILI symptoms, whilst only 2.4% and 1.1%, respectively, developed laboratory-confirmed influenza. No RCTs assessing vaccination in pregnant women were found. The only evidence available comes from observational studies with modest methodological quality. On this basis, vaccination shows very limited effects: NNV 92 (95% CI 63 to 201) against ILI in pregnant women and NNV 27 (95% CI 18 to 185) against laboratory-confirmed influenza in newborns from vaccinated women. Live aerosol vaccines have an overall effectiveness corresponding to a NNV 46 (95% CI 29 to 115). The performance of one-dose or two-dose whole virion pandemic vaccines was higher, showing a NNV of 16 (95% CI 14 to 20) against ILI and a NNV of 35 (95% CI 33 to 47) against influenza, while a limited impact on hospitalisation was found (NNV 94, 95% CI 70 to 1022). Vaccination had a modest effect on time off work and had no effect on hospital admissions or complication rates. Inactivated vaccines caused local harms. No evidence of association with serious adverse events was found, but the harms evidence base was limited. The overall risk of bias in the included trials is unclear because it was not possible to assess the real impact of bias. Authors' conclusions Influenza vaccines have a very modest effect in reducing influenza symptoms and working days lost in the general population, including pregnant women. No evidence of association between influenza vaccination and serious adverse events was found in the comparative studies considered in the review. This review includes 90 studies, 24 of which (26.7%) were funded totally or partially by industry. Out of the 48 RCTs, 17 were industry-funded (35.4%).
引用
收藏
页数:267
相关论文
共 288 条
  • [1] Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2006, MMWR Recomm Rep, V55, P1
  • [2] Elevated Inflammatory Mediators in Adults with Oculorespiratory Syndrome following Influenza Immunization: a Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes of Health Research Influenza Research Network Study
    Al-Dabbagh, Mona
    Lapphra, Keswadee
    Scheifele, David W.
    Halperin, Scott A.
    Langley, Joanne M.
    Cho, Patricia
    Kollmann, Tobias R.
    Li, Yan
    De Serres, Gaston
    Fortuno, Edgardo S., III
    Bettinger, Julie A.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 20 (08) : 1108 - 1114
  • [3] Ambrosch F, 1976, Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg), V55, P57
  • [4] The safety and effectiveness of self-administration of intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine in adults
    Ambrose, Christopher S.
    Wu, Xionghua
    [J]. VACCINE, 2013, 31 (06) : 857 - 860
  • [5] [Anonymous], BMJ
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2009, CLIN EVID
  • [7] [Anonymous], AM J OBSTET GYNEC S6
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2012, REV MAN REVMAN 5 2
  • [9] [Anonymous], DEV BIOL STANDARDIZA
  • [10] [Anonymous], EURO SURVEILLANCE