Use of HbA1c for Diagnoses of Diabetes and Prediabetes: Comparison with Diagnoses Based on Fasting and 2-Hr Glucose Values and Effects of Gender, Race, and Age

被引:95
作者
Guo, Fangjian [1 ]
Moellering, Douglas R. [1 ]
Garvey, W. Timothy [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Nutr Sci, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
[2] Birmingham Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Birmingham, AL USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HEMOGLOBIN A(1C); PREVALENCE; TOLERANCE; A1C; PREVENTION; ADULTS; CLASSIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; HBA(1C); TRENDS;
D O I
10.1089/met.2013.0128
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) has been advocated for the diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes. Its performance has been commonly assessed in corroboration with elevated fasting plasma glucose (FPG), but not the combination of FPG and 2-hr glucose values. This study assesses receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of HbA1c pertaining to the diagnoses of prediabetes and diabetes by FPG and/or 2-hr glucose, and the effects of age, gender, and race. Methods: We assessed the utility of HbA1c for diagnosing diabetes and prediabetes among 5395 adults without known diabetes from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2010. Results: Current cutoffs of HbA1c for diabetes (6.5%) or prediabetes (5.7%) exhibited low sensitivity (0.249 and 0.354, respectively) and high specificity in identifying patients diagnosed using both FPG and 2-hr glucose, resulting in large false-negative rates (75.1% and 64.9%). Misdiagnosis rates increased with age and in non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans. When HbA1c was combined with FPG for diagnoses, the false-negative rate remained high for diabetes (45.7%), but was reduced for prediabetes (9.2%). Conclusions: When assessed against diagnoses using both FPG and 2-hr glucose, HbA1c had low sensitivity and high specificity for identifying diabetes and prediabetes, which varied as a function of age and race. Regarding recently released American Diabetes Association (ADA) and joint European guidelines, it is important to consider that HbA1c values below 6.5% and 5.7% do not reliably exclude the presence of diabetes and prediabetes, respectively. Overall, the data argue for greater use of oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) and both FPG and 2-hr glucose values for diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 268
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Independent Association of HbA1c and Incident Cardiovascular Disease in People Without Diabetes
    Adams, Robert J.
    Appleton, Sarah L.
    Hill, Catherine L.
    Wilson, David H.
    Taylor, Anne W.
    Chittleborough, Catherine R.
    Gill, Tiffany K.
    Ruffin, Richard E.
    [J]. OBESITY, 2009, 17 (03) : 559 - 563
  • [2] Amer Diabet Assoc, 2011, DIABETES CARE, V34, pS11, DOI [10.2337/dc10-S062, 10.2337/dc14-S081, 10.2337/dc11-S011, 10.2337/dc13-S011, 10.2337/dc13-S067, 10.2337/dc12-s064, 10.2337/dc11-S062, 10.2337/dc10-S011, 10.2337/dc12-s011]
  • [4] [Anonymous], NAT HLTH NUTR EX SUR
  • [5] Comparison of A1C and Fasting Glucose Criteria to Diagnose Diabetes Among US Adults
    Carson, April P.
    Reynolds, Kristi
    Fonseca, Vivian A.
    Muntner, Paul
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2010, 33 (01) : 95 - 97
  • [6] Acarbose for prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the STOPNIDDM randomised trial
    Chiasson, JL
    Josse, RG
    Gomis, R
    Hanefeld, M
    Karasik, A
    Laakso, M
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 359 (9323) : 2072 - 2077
  • [7] Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the US Population in 1988-2006
    Cowie, Catherine C.
    Rust, Keith F.
    Byrd-Holt, Danita D.
    Gregg, Edward W.
    Ford, Earl S.
    Geiss, Linda S.
    Bainbridge, Kathleen E.
    Fradkin, Judith E.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2010, 33 (03) : 562 - 568
  • [8] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [9] Estimation of the Youden index and its associated cutoff point
    Fluss, R
    Faraggi, D
    Reiser, B
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 47 (04) : 458 - 472
  • [10] Fonseca VA, 2009, DIABETES CARE, V32, P1, DOI [10.2337/dc09-9033, 10.2337/dc09-S301]