National Survey of Patients' Bill of Rights Statutes

被引:8
|
作者
Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. [1 ]
Jacob, Dan M. [2 ]
Hochhauser, Mark [3 ]
Parker, Ruth M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Gen Internal Med Sect, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Healthcare Analyt LLC, New York, NY USA
[3] Readabil Consultant, Golden Valley, MN USA
[4] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
patient rights; readability; policy; literacy; INFORMED-CONSENT; MANAGED-CARE; DOCUMENTS; ACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-009-0914-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite vigorous national debate between 1999-2001 the federal patients' bill of rights (PBOR) was not enacted. However, states have enacted legislation and the Joint Commission defined an accreditation standard to present patients with their rights. Because such initiatives can be undermined by overly complex language, we surveyed the readability of hospital PBOR documents as well as texts mandated by state law. State Web sites and codes were searched to identify PBOR statutes for general patient populations. The rights addressed were compared with the 12 themes presented in the American Hospital Association's (AHA) PBOR text of 2002. In addition, we obtained PBOR texts from a sample of hospitals in each state. Readability was evaluated using Prose, a software program which reports an average of eight readability formulas. Of 23 states with a PBOR statute for the general public, all establish a grievance policy, four protect a private right of action, and one stipulates fines for violations. These laws address an average of 7.4 of the 12 AHA themes. Nine states' statutes specify PBOR text for distribution to patients. These documents have an average readability of 15th grade (range, 11.6, New York, to 17.0, Minnesota). PBOR documents from 240 US hospitals have an average readability of 14th grade (range, 8.2 to 17.0). While the average U.S. adult reads at an 8th grade reading level, an advanced college reading level is routinely required to read PBOR documents. Patients are not likely to learn about their rights from documents they cannot read.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 494
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment Practices of Professional Psychologists: Results of a National Survey
    Wright, Caroline Vaile
    Beattie, Shannon G.
    Galper, Daniel I.
    Church, Abere Sawaqdeh
    Bufka, Lynn F.
    Brabender, Virginia M.
    Smith, Bruce L.
    PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2017, 48 (02) : 73 - 78
  • [42] Patients' Rights and the Texas Mental Health Law
    Truong, Thanh Thuy
    Matorin, Anu
    David, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (01) : 67 - 71
  • [43] The Perspective of Emergency Department Professionals on Patients Rights
    Bilir, Ozlem
    Sismanlar, Dilek
    Ersunan, Gokhan
    Ayaz, Teslime
    KONURALP TIP DERGISI, 2015, 7 (01): : 28 - 33
  • [44] Practicing patients' rights in Iran: a review of evidence
    Sharifi, Tahere
    Gooshki, Ehsan Shamsi
    Mosadeghrad, Ali Mohammad
    Jaafaripooyan, Ebrahim
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS AND HISTORY OF MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 1 - 17
  • [45] Rights of patients required in a public service ombudsman
    Martins, Maristela Santini
    Goese, Priscila Becher
    Barrionovo, Marta Martins
    Komatsu Braga Massarollo, Maria Cristina
    REV RENE, 2015, 16 (03) : 337 - 344
  • [46] Cancer patients' knowledge about their legal rights
    Sonobe, Helena Megumi
    Buetto, Luciana Scatralhe
    Fontao Zago, Marcia Maria
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2011, 45 (02) : 339 - 345
  • [47] OBSERVING PATIENTS' RIGHTS, BETWEEN PERCEPTION AND REALITY
    Saseanu, Andreea Simona
    Enache, Antonia Cristiana
    Sarbu, Roxana
    Marinescu, Mihai
    BASIQ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: NEW TRENDS IN SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS AND CONSUMPTION 2016, 2016, : 258 - 265
  • [48] Citizenship Rights for Immigrants: National Political Processes and Cross-National Convergence in Western Europe, 1980-2008
    Koopmans, Ruud
    Michalowski, Ines
    Waibel, Stine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2012, 117 (04) : 1202 - 1245
  • [49] The Strength of Weak Review: National Courts, Interpretive Canons, and Human Rights Treaties
    Lupu, Yonatan
    Verdier, Pierre-Hugues
    Versteeg, Mila
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2019, 63 (03) : 507 - 520
  • [50] Patientenautonomie und PatientenrechtePatients’ autonomy and patients’ rights
    C. Katzenmeier
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 2012, 55 (9) : 1093 - 1099