National Survey of Patients' Bill of Rights Statutes

被引:8
|
作者
Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. [1 ]
Jacob, Dan M. [2 ]
Hochhauser, Mark [3 ]
Parker, Ruth M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Gen Internal Med Sect, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Healthcare Analyt LLC, New York, NY USA
[3] Readabil Consultant, Golden Valley, MN USA
[4] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
patient rights; readability; policy; literacy; INFORMED-CONSENT; MANAGED-CARE; DOCUMENTS; ACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-009-0914-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite vigorous national debate between 1999-2001 the federal patients' bill of rights (PBOR) was not enacted. However, states have enacted legislation and the Joint Commission defined an accreditation standard to present patients with their rights. Because such initiatives can be undermined by overly complex language, we surveyed the readability of hospital PBOR documents as well as texts mandated by state law. State Web sites and codes were searched to identify PBOR statutes for general patient populations. The rights addressed were compared with the 12 themes presented in the American Hospital Association's (AHA) PBOR text of 2002. In addition, we obtained PBOR texts from a sample of hospitals in each state. Readability was evaluated using Prose, a software program which reports an average of eight readability formulas. Of 23 states with a PBOR statute for the general public, all establish a grievance policy, four protect a private right of action, and one stipulates fines for violations. These laws address an average of 7.4 of the 12 AHA themes. Nine states' statutes specify PBOR text for distribution to patients. These documents have an average readability of 15th grade (range, 11.6, New York, to 17.0, Minnesota). PBOR documents from 240 US hospitals have an average readability of 14th grade (range, 8.2 to 17.0). While the average U.S. adult reads at an 8th grade reading level, an advanced college reading level is routinely required to read PBOR documents. Patients are not likely to learn about their rights from documents they cannot read.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 494
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Informed consent in the patients' rights law
    Figueroa G, Rodolfo
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2012, 140 (10) : 1347 - 1351
  • [32] Patients' awareness of their rights in a developing country
    Kuzu, N
    Ergin, A
    Zencir, M
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 120 (04) : 290 - 296
  • [33] PROTECTION OF PATIENTS' RIGHTS DURING A PANDEMIC
    Nozimakhon, Gafurova
    Faringiz, Yusupova
    Nodirbek, Yusupov
    RUSSIAN LAW JOURNAL, 2023, 11 (07) : 191 - 197
  • [34] Hospitalised patients' awareness of their rights: a cross-sectional survey from a tertiary care hospital on the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia
    Yousuf, R. M.
    Fauzi, A. R. M.
    How, S. H.
    Akter, S. F. U.
    Shah, A.
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 50 (05) : 494 - 499
  • [35] Gender fluidity and "other left-wing superstitions": problem representations in the inquiry report on the NSW Parental Rights Bill
    Fagan, Lydia
    Rawlings, Victoria
    EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 2024,
  • [36] Out of hours ophthalmic surgery: a UK national survey
    O'Colmain, U.
    Wright, M.
    Bennett, H.
    MacEwen, C. J.
    EYE, 2013, 27 (03) : 363 - 366
  • [37] Consent for cataract surgery training: a national trainers’ survey
    L Steeples
    K Mercieca
    K Smyth
    Eye, 2012, 26 : 666 - 670
  • [38] Consent for cataract surgery training: a national trainers' survey
    Steeples, L.
    Mercieca, K.
    Smyth, K.
    EYE, 2012, 26 (05) : 666 - 670
  • [39] Out of hours ophthalmic surgery: a UK national survey
    U O'Colmain
    M Wright
    H Bennett
    C J MacEwen
    Eye, 2013, 27 : 363 - 366
  • [40] Planning for Extreme Heat: A National Survey of US Planners
    Meerow, Sara
    Keith, Ladd
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2022, 88 (03) : 319 - 334