National Survey of Patients' Bill of Rights Statutes

被引:8
|
作者
Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. [1 ]
Jacob, Dan M. [2 ]
Hochhauser, Mark [3 ]
Parker, Ruth M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Gen Internal Med Sect, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Healthcare Analyt LLC, New York, NY USA
[3] Readabil Consultant, Golden Valley, MN USA
[4] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
patient rights; readability; policy; literacy; INFORMED-CONSENT; MANAGED-CARE; DOCUMENTS; ACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-009-0914-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite vigorous national debate between 1999-2001 the federal patients' bill of rights (PBOR) was not enacted. However, states have enacted legislation and the Joint Commission defined an accreditation standard to present patients with their rights. Because such initiatives can be undermined by overly complex language, we surveyed the readability of hospital PBOR documents as well as texts mandated by state law. State Web sites and codes were searched to identify PBOR statutes for general patient populations. The rights addressed were compared with the 12 themes presented in the American Hospital Association's (AHA) PBOR text of 2002. In addition, we obtained PBOR texts from a sample of hospitals in each state. Readability was evaluated using Prose, a software program which reports an average of eight readability formulas. Of 23 states with a PBOR statute for the general public, all establish a grievance policy, four protect a private right of action, and one stipulates fines for violations. These laws address an average of 7.4 of the 12 AHA themes. Nine states' statutes specify PBOR text for distribution to patients. These documents have an average readability of 15th grade (range, 11.6, New York, to 17.0, Minnesota). PBOR documents from 240 US hospitals have an average readability of 14th grade (range, 8.2 to 17.0). While the average U.S. adult reads at an 8th grade reading level, an advanced college reading level is routinely required to read PBOR documents. Patients are not likely to learn about their rights from documents they cannot read.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 494
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] National Survey of Patients’ Bill of Rights Statutes
    Michael K. Paasche-Orlow
    Dan M. Jacob
    Mark Hochhauser
    Ruth M. Parker
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2009, 24 : 489 - 494
  • [2] Negative effects of the patients' rights law and neuro-rights bill in Chile
    Ruiz, Sergio
    Ramos-Vergara, Paulina
    Concha, Rodrigo
    Altermatt, Fernando
    Von-Bernhardi, Rommy
    Cuello, Mauricio
    Godoy, Jaime
    Valera, Luca
    Araya, Pablo
    Conde, Edgardo
    Toro, Pablo
    Caneo, Constanza
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2021, 149 (03) : 439 - 446
  • [3] Alignment between the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the National Core Indicators Adult Consumer Survey
    Ticha, Renata
    Qian, Xueqin
    Stancliffe, Roger J.
    Larson, Sheryl A.
    Bonardi, Alexandra
    JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2018, 15 (03) : 247 - 255
  • [4] Principal Evaluation in the United States: A National Review of State Statutes and Regulations
    Nielsen, Sarah R.
    Lavigne, Alyson L.
    EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS ARCHIVES, 2020, 28
  • [5] Use of Patients' Own Medications in Canadian Hospitals: A National Survey
    Lummis, Heather
    Sketris, Ingrid
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2008, 61 (02) : 114 - 122
  • [7] Ostomy and Continent Diversion Patient Bill of Rights Research Validation of Standards of Care
    Burgess-Stocks, Joanna
    Gleba, Jeanine
    Lawrence, Kathleen
    Mueller, Susan
    JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2022, 49 (03) : 251 - 260
  • [8] The association between telehealth service utilization and healthcare services during the pandemic: evidence from a national survey of American patients
    Pulice, Eric
    Lee, Doohee
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2025,
  • [9] Critical analysis of a public policy: An occupational therapist's experience with the Patient Bill of Rights
    Lohman, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2003, 57 (04) : 468 - 472
  • [10] A cross-national analysis of the guarantees of rights
    Sommer, Udi
    Asal, Victor
    INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2014, 35 (04) : 463 - 481