Species richness and occupancy estimation in communities subject to temporary emigration

被引:87
|
作者
Kery, Marc [1 ]
Royle, J. Andrew [2 ]
Plattner, Matthias [3 ]
Dorazio, Robert M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Ornithol Inst, CH-6204 Sempach, Switzerland
[2] USGS, Patuxent Wildlife Res Ctr, Laurel, MD 20708 USA
[3] Hintermann & Weber AG, Ecol Consultancy Planning & Res, Reinach, Switzerland
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Stat, Florida Integrated Sci Ctr, USGS, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
biodiversity; butterfly survey; community; hierarchical Bayes; monitoring; multistate model; occupancy; robust design; species richness; state-space model; temporary emigration; unobservable state; ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY; CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA; DETECTION PROBABILITIES; BRITISH BUTTERFLIES; POPULATION-SIZE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ABUNDANCE; MODELS; DETECTABILITY; COUNTS;
D O I
10.1890/07-1794.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Species richness is the most common biodiversity metric, although typically some species remain unobserved. Therefore, estimates of species richness and related quantities should account for imperfect detectability. Community dynamics can often be represented as superposition of species-specific phenologies (e. g., in taxa with well-defined flight [insects], activity [rodents], or vegetation periods [plants]). We develop a model for such predictably open communities wherein species richness is expressed as the sum over observed and unobserved species of estimated species-specific and site-specific occurrence indicators and where seasonal occurrence is modeled as a species-specific function of time. Our model is a multispecies extension of a multistate model with one unobservable state and represents a parsimonious way of dealing with a widespread form of "temporary emigration.'' For illustration we use Swiss butterfly monitoring data collected under a robust design (RD); species were recorded on 13 transects during two secondary periods within <= 7 primary sampling periods. We compare estimates with those under a variation of the model applied to standard data, where secondary samples are pooled. The latter model yielded unrealistically high estimates of total community size of 274 species. In contrast, estimates were similar under models applied to RD data with constant (122) or seasonally varying (126) detectability for each species, but the former was more parsimonious and therefore used for inference. Per transect, 6 44 (mean 21.1) species were detected. Species richness estimates averaged 29.3; therefore only 71% (range 32-92%) of all species present were ever detected. In any primary period, 0.4-5.6 species present were overlooked. Detectability varied by species and averaged 0.88 per primary sampling period. Our modeling framework is extremely flexible; extensions such as covariates for the occurrence or detectability of individual species are easy. It should be useful for communities with a predictable form of temporary emigration where rigorous estimation of community metrics has proved challenging so far.
引用
收藏
页码:1279 / 1290
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sampling the limits of species richness in marine phytoplankton communities
    Cermeno, Pedro
    Teixeira, Isabel G.
    Branco, Miguel
    Figueiras, Francisco G.
    Maranon, Emilio
    JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH, 2014, 36 (04) : 1135 - 1139
  • [32] Species richness limitations in productive and oligotrophic plant communities
    Pärtel, M
    Zobel, M
    Liira, J
    Zobel, K
    OIKOS, 2000, 90 (01) : 191 - 193
  • [33] SPECIES RICHNESS IN HELMINTH COMMUNITIES - THE IMPORTANCE OF MULTIPLE CONGENERS
    KENNEDY, CR
    BUSH, AO
    PARASITOLOGY, 1992, 104 : 189 - 197
  • [34] SPECIES RICHNESS AND STABILITY OF SPACE-LIMITED COMMUNITIES
    YODZIS, P
    NATURE, 1976, 264 (5586) : 540 - 541
  • [35] Phytosociological spectrum as an indicator of species richness of plant communities
    S. M. Yamalov
    A. V. Bayanov
    Russian Journal of Ecology, 2010, 41 : 180 - 182
  • [36] The effect of environmental stochasticity on species richness in neutral communities
    Danino, Matan
    Shnerb, Nadav M.
    Azaele, Sandro
    Kunin, William E.
    Kessler, David A.
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 409 : 155 - 164
  • [37] Phytosociological spectrum as an indicator of species richness of plant communities
    Yamalov, S. M.
    Bayanov, A. V.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2010, 41 (02) : 180 - 182
  • [38] Continuous Bayesian networks for the estimation of species richness
    Maldonado A.D.
    Ropero R.F.
    Aguilera P.A.
    Rumí R.
    Salmerón A.
    Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2015, 4 (3-4) : 49 - 57
  • [39] ON THE USE OF SOME METHODS FOR THE ESTIMATION OF SPECIES RICHNESS
    BALTANAS, A
    OIKOS, 1992, 65 (03) : 484 - 492
  • [40] Comparative performance of species richness estimation methods
    Walther, BA
    Morand, S
    PARASITOLOGY, 1998, 116 : 395 - 405