Impact of rurality on maternal and infant health indicators and outcomes in Maine

被引:0
|
作者
Harris, D. E. [1 ]
Aboueissa, A-M [1 ]
Baugh, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Maine, Sch Nursing, Portland, ME 04103 USA
来源
RURAL AND REMOTE HEALTH | 2015年 / 15卷 / 03期
关键词
health indicators; infant; maternal; prenatal care; USA; BIRTH OUTCOMES; URBAN; CARE; DISPARITIES; PREGNANCY; SMOKING; ACCESS; RATES; RISK; US;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Rural residents may face health challenges related to geographic barriers to care, physician shortages, poverty, lower educational attainment, and other demographic factors. In maternal and child health, these disparities may be evidenced by the health risks and behaviors of new mothers, the health of infants born to these mothers, and the care received by both mothers and infants. Methods: To determine the impact of rurality on maternal and child health in Maine, USA, 11 years of data (2000-2010) for the state of Maine from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) project were analyzed. PRAMS is a national public health surveillance system that uses questionnaires to survey women who had delivered live infants in the previous 2-4 months. Using a geographic information system, each questionnaire response was assigned a rurality tier (urban, suburban, large rural town, or isolated rural community) based on the rural-urban commuting area code of the town of residence of the mother. Results from the four rurality tiers were compared using the survey procedures in Statistical Analysis Software to adjust for the complex sampling strategy of the PRAMS dataset. Means (for continuous variables) and percentages (for categorical variables) were calculated for each rurality tier, along with 9 5% confidence intervals. Significant differences between rurality tiers were tested for using F-tests or chi(2) tests. If significant differences between rurality tiers existed (p < 0.05), specific tiers were judged to be different from each other if their 9 5% confidence intervals did not overlap. Results: A total of 12 600 mothers responded to the PRAMS questionnaire during the study period. Compared to mothers from more urban areas, rural mothers were younger (10.5% of mothers from isolated rural areas were teenagers compared to 6.2% of mothers from urban areas), less well educated, less likely to be married, and more likely to live in lower income households (3 9.6% of isolated rural mothers had household incomes ? US$ 20 000/year vs 28.8% of urban mothers). Rural mothers had higher pre-pregnancy body mass indexes (BMIs; average BMI 26.1 for isolated rural women vs 25.3 for urban women) and were more likely to smoke but less likely to drink alcohol (both before and during pregnancy). Compared to mothers from more urban areas, rural mothers were not sure they were pregnant until a later gestational age but received prenatal care just as early and were just as likely to receive prenatal care as early as they wished. There were no differences among rurality tiers in Caesarean section rates, rates of premature births (< 37 weeks gestation), or rates of underweight births (< 2500 g). However infants born to rural mothers were less likely to be breastfed (52. 9 % of isolated rural vs 60. 9 % of urban infants breast fed for >= 8 weeks). Conclusions: These results show that, while rural women face significant demographic and behavior challenges, their access to prenatal care, the care they receive while pregnant, and the outcomes of their pregnancies are similar to those of urban women. These results highlight areas where focused pre-pregnancy and prenatal education may improve maternal and child health in rural Maine.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Maternal geographic residence, local health service supply and birth outcomes
    Haraldsdottir, Sigridur
    Gudmundsson, Sigurdur
    Bjarnadottir, Ragnheidur I.
    Lund, Sigrun H.
    Valdimarsdottir, Unnur A.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2015, 94 (02) : 156 - 164
  • [2] Associations between maternal residential rurality and maternal health, access to care, and very low birthweight infant outcomes
    Ondusko, Devlynne S.
    Liu, Jessica
    Hatch, Brigit
    Profit, Jochen
    Carter, Emily Hawkins
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (12) : 1592 - 1599
  • [3] The Impact of Obstetric Unit Closures on Maternal and Infant Pregnancy Outcomes
    Lorch, Scott A.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Ahlberg, Corinne
    Small, Dylan S.
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 48 (02) : 455 - 475
  • [4] Postpartum Anxiety and Maternal-Infant Health Outcomes
    Paul, Ian M.
    Downs, Danielle S.
    Schaefer, Eric W.
    Beiler, Jessica S.
    Weisman, Carol S.
    PEDIATRICS, 2013, 131 (04) : E1218 - E1224
  • [5] The effects of CenteringPregnancy on maternal and infant health outcomes: a moderation analysis
    Park, Chul H.
    Driver, Nichola
    Richards, Robert C.
    Ward, Penny
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 45 (04) : e746 - e754
  • [6] Measuring the Impact and Outcomes of Maternal Child Health Federal Programs
    Taylor, Yhenneko J.
    Nies, Mary A.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2013, 17 (05) : 886 - 896
  • [7] The Effect of Hospital Maternity Ward Closures on Maternal and Infant Health
    Battaglia, Emily
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2025, 11 (02) : 201 - 246
  • [8] The impact of the UK Baby Friendly Initiative on maternal and infant health outcomes: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Fallon, Victoria May
    Harrold, Joanne Alison
    Chisholm, Anna
    MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION, 2019, 15 (03)
  • [9] Oral health and related risk indicators in north-central Appalachia differ by rurality
    Zhou, Yuqiao
    Cuddy, Richard
    McNeil, Daniel W.
    Wright, Casey D.
    Crout, Richard J.
    Feingold, Eleanor
    Neiswanger, Katherine
    Marazita, Mary L.
    Shaffer, John R.
    COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 49 (05) : 427 - 436
  • [10] Specialised antenatal clinics for women with a multiple pregnancy for improving maternal and infant outcomes
    Dodd, Jodie M.
    Dowswell, Therese
    Crowther, Caroline A.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (11):