Computer-aided diagnosis of lung nodule classification between benign nodule, primary lung cancer, and metastatic lung cancer at different image size using deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning

被引:114
作者
Nishio, Mizuho [1 ,2 ]
Sugiyama, Osamu [2 ]
Yakami, Masahiro [1 ,2 ]
Ueno, Syoko [3 ]
Kubo, Takeshi [1 ]
Kuroda, Tomohiro [4 ]
Togashi, Kaori [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Imaging & Nucl Med, Kyoto, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Preempt Med & Lifestyle Related Dis Res Ctr, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Informat, Dept Social Informat, Yoshidahonmachi, Kyoto, Japan
[4] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Div Med Informat Technol & Adm Planning, Kyoto, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 07期
关键词
LOW-DOSE CT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0200721
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We developed a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) method for classification between benign nodule, primary lung cancer, and metastatic lung cancer and evaluated the following: (i) the usefulness of the deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) for CADx of the ternary classification, compared with a conventional method (hand-crafted imaging feature plus machine learning), (ii) the effectiveness of transfer learning, and (iii) the effect of image size as the DCNN input. Among 1240 patients of previously-built database, computed tomography images and clinical information of 1236 patients were included. For the conventional method, CADx was performed by using rotation-invariant uniform-pattern local binary pattern on three orthogonal planes with a support vector machine. For the DCNN method, CADx was evaluated using the VGG-16 convolutional neural network with and without transfer learning, and hyperparameter optimization of the DCNN method was performed by random search. The best averaged validation accuracies of CADx were 55.9%, 68.0%, and 62.4% for the conventional method, the DCNN method with transfer learning, and the DCNN method without transfer learning, respectively. For image size of 56, 112, and 224, the best averaged validation accuracy for the DCNN with transfer learning were 60.7%, 64.7%, and 68.0%, respectively. DCNN was better than the conventional method for CADx, and the accuracy of DCNN improved when using transfer learning. Also, we found that larger image sizes as inputs to DCNN improved the accuracy of lung nodule classification.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[2]   Lung Nodule Detection using 3D Convolutional Neural Networks Trained on Weakly Labeled Data [J].
Anirudhi, Rushil ;
Thiagarajan, Jayaraman J. ;
Bremer, Timo ;
Kim, Hyojin .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 9785
[3]  
[Anonymous], MED IMAGING TECHNOL
[4]  
[Anonymous], PRACTICAL GUIDE SUPP
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, IEEE I CONF COMP VIS, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICCV.2015.123
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, IMAGE BASED COMPUTER
[7]  
[Anonymous], SCREENING REPORTING
[8]  
[Anonymous], TUMORNET LUNG NODULE
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ACM T INTEL SYST TEC, DOI DOI 10.1145/1961189.1961199
[10]  
Antony J, 2016, INT C PATT RECOG, P1195, DOI 10.1109/ICPR.2016.7899799