Consumer-Mediated Data Exchange for Research: Current State of US Law, Technology, and Trust

被引:2
作者
Bracha, Yiscah [1 ]
Bagwell, Jacqueline [1 ]
Furberg, Robert [1 ]
Wald, Jonathan S. [2 ]
机构
[1] RTI Int, Div eHlth Qual & Analyt, 3040 E Cornwallis Rd,POB 12194, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] InterSystems, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
health records; personal; electronic health records; patient access to records; research; trust; data collection; consumer health information; HEALTH RECORD DATA; CARE; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.2196/12348
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
A compendium of US laws and regulations offers increasingly strong support for the concept that researchers can acquire the electronic health record data that their studies need directly from the study participants using technologies and processes called consumer-mediated data exchange. This data acquisition method is particularly valuable for studies that need complete longitudinal electronic records for all their study participants who individually and collectively receive care from multiple providers in the United States. In such studies, it is logistically infeasible for the researcher to receive necessary data directly from each provider, including providers who may not have the capability, capacity, or interest in supporting research. This paper is a tutorial to inform the researcher who faces these data acquisition challenges about the opportunities offered by consumer-mediated data exchange. It outlines 2 approaches and reviews the current state of provider-and consumer-facing technologies that are necessary to support each approach. For one approach, the technology is developed and estimated to be widely available but could raise trust concerns among research organizations or their institutional review boards because of the current state of US law applicable to consumer-facing technologies. For the other approach, which does not elicit the same trust concerns, the necessary technology is emerging and a pilot is underway. After reading this paper, the researcher who has not been following these developments should have a good understanding of the legal, regulatory, technology, and trust issues surrounding consumer-mediated data exchange for research, with an awareness of what is potentially possible now, what is not possible now, and what could change in the future. The researcher interested in trying consumer-mediated data exchange will also be able to anticipate and respond to an anticipated barrier: the trust concerns that their own organizations could raise.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 273
页数:18
相关论文
共 102 条
  • [1] What Is Trust? Ethics and Risk Governance in Precision Medicine and Predictive Analytics
    Adjekum, Afua
    Ienca, Marcello
    Vayena, Effy
    [J]. OMICS-A JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 21 (12) : 704 - 710
  • [2] [Anonymous], IND AB EL ACC THEIR
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, INTERNET THINGS PRIV
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, EX OV PRIV SEC HLTH
  • [5] [Anonymous], IMPR HLTH REC REQ PR
  • [6] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [7] Apple, 2019, I SUPP HLTH REC IPHO
  • [8] Apple Inc, 2019, EMP YOUR PAT HLTH RE
  • [9] TRUST AND ANTITRUST
    BAIER, A
    [J]. ETHICS, 1986, 96 (02) : 231 - 260
  • [10] Primary and Specialty medical care among ethnically diverse, older rural adults with type 2 diabetes: The ELDER Diabetes Study
    Bell, RA
    Quandt, SA
    Arcury, TA
    Snively, BM
    Stafford, JM
    Smith, SL
    Skelly, AH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2005, 21 (03) : 198 - 205