Protocol of investigation into reporting quality of RCT abstracts on COVID-19 pursuant to CONSORT (CoCo study)-a review

被引:0
|
作者
Tulka, Sabrina [1 ]
Baulig, Christine [1 ]
Knippschild, Stephanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Witten Herdecke Univ, Fac Hlth, Chair Med Biometry & Epidemiol IMBE, Alfred Herrhausen Str 50, D-58448 Witten, Germany
关键词
COVID-19; CONSORT; Reporting quality; RCT; Transparency; Coronavirus; SARS-CoV-2;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-021-05937-8
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic developed into a global crisis, the enormity and urgency of which accelerated research activities in the field. At the same time, manuscripts describing these research projects underwent fast-track peer review procedures and were published in freely accessible formats. Although full texts about COVID-19 are currently available for free, abstracts continue to play a key role since they provide essential information and possibly a decision basis for therapies. Abstracts are particularly important in case the full texts are not free, not all reports have been published in English and in emergency situations when there is less time for comprehensive analysis of all full texts. It is therefore necessary to ensure that abstracts-as publications in miniature format-contain comprehensive and transparent information. The CONSORT statement for abstracts (CONSORT-A) offers guidelines to authors how to include all necessary information in an abstract. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the quality of reporting in medical research had already been the object of debate and criticism. The current crisis makes comprehensive documentation all the more important. Abstracts of COVID-19 RCTs should therefore report the criteria listed in the CONSORT-A statement fully and verifiably. The objective of this study is to check the completeness of abstracts of all COVID-19 RTCs published to date. Methods Based on a literature search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library, all publications up to 29 October 2020 are identified and examined in terms of the subject matter (reported results from COVID-19 studies) and their study design (RTC). Subsequently, suitable publications are examined for completeness and quality of abstracts. The CONSORT checklist for RTC abstracts serves as a basis in this procedure. The primary endpoint of the study is the percentage of correctly implemented items of the CONSORT statement for abstracts. The frequency of correct reporting of each individual item is checked in a second step. Discussion The study is expected to contribute to evaluating the reporting quality on COVID-19 studies, and specifically the completeness of abstracts of RTCs. It may thus support the assessment of current research into COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quality of reporting of literature search strategies in systematic reviews published on the role of telehealth during COVID-19
    Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh
    Gavgani, Vahideh Zarea
    Fathifar, Zahra
    Makani, Nasrin
    Vaez, Reyhaneh
    Montazeri, Maryam
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2024, 50 (02) : 291 - 302
  • [42] Clinical study on acupuncture treatment of COVID-19 A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luo, Wenjun
    Zhai, Yan
    Sun, Mi
    Guo, Dong
    Xie, Fang
    Yu, Zhou
    Tang, Zunhao
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (02) : E28296
  • [43] Stigma of dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review protocol
    Bacsu, Juanita-Dawne R.
    Rahemi, Zahra
    Nanson, Kate
    Webster, Claire
    Norman, Myrna
    Spiteri, Raymond J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (08):
  • [44] Remdesivir-associated bradycardia in COVID-19: a rapid review protocol
    Tian, Elli
    Cosme, Celica
    Bauzon, Justin
    Batra, Kavita
    Azar, Fadi
    Schreiber, Ariyon
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [45] Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on medical students: a scoping review protocol
    Sanjaya, Ardo
    Edwin, Christian
    Supantini, Dedeh
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [46] Adherence with reporting of ethical standards in COVID-19 human studies: a rapid review
    O'Sullivan, Lydia
    Killeen, Ronan P.
    Doran, Peter
    Crowley, Rachel K.
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [47] Impact of COVID-19 on antimicrobial stewardship program: Study protocol
    Jawhar, Duaa Salem
    Khan, Amer Hayat
    Abubakar, Usman
    METHODSX, 2024, 12
  • [48] Challenges of developing, conducting, analysing and reporting a COVID-19 study as the COVID-19 pandemic unfolds: an online co-autoethnographic study
    das Nair, Roshan
    Hunter, Rachael
    Garjani, Afagh
    Middleton, Rod M.
    Tuite-Dalton, Katherine A.
    Nicholas, Richard S.
    Evangelou, Nikos
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (06):
  • [49] Psychological resilience during COVID-19: a meta-review protocol
    Seaborn, Katie
    Chignell, Mark
    Gwizdka, Jacek
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (06):
  • [50] Obesity and clinical severity in patients with COVID-19: a scoping review protocol
    Marcela Larissa Costa
    Carlos Adriano Santos Souza
    Ana Caroline Cardoso Silva
    Dayane Franciely Conceição Santos
    Edilene Fernandes Nonato
    Francismayne Batista Santana
    Giselle dos Santos Dias
    Jessyca Teles Barreto
    Laís Santos Costa
    Maria Carolina Barros Costa
    Tamila das Neves Ferreira
    Jeniffer Santos Santana
    Raquel Simões Mendes-Netto
    Tereza Virgínia Silva Bezerra do Nascimento
    Marco Antônio Prado Nunes
    Márcia Ferreira Cândido de Souza
    Systematic Reviews, 10