Protocol of investigation into reporting quality of RCT abstracts on COVID-19 pursuant to CONSORT (CoCo study)-a review

被引:0
|
作者
Tulka, Sabrina [1 ]
Baulig, Christine [1 ]
Knippschild, Stephanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Witten Herdecke Univ, Fac Hlth, Chair Med Biometry & Epidemiol IMBE, Alfred Herrhausen Str 50, D-58448 Witten, Germany
关键词
COVID-19; CONSORT; Reporting quality; RCT; Transparency; Coronavirus; SARS-CoV-2;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-021-05937-8
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic developed into a global crisis, the enormity and urgency of which accelerated research activities in the field. At the same time, manuscripts describing these research projects underwent fast-track peer review procedures and were published in freely accessible formats. Although full texts about COVID-19 are currently available for free, abstracts continue to play a key role since they provide essential information and possibly a decision basis for therapies. Abstracts are particularly important in case the full texts are not free, not all reports have been published in English and in emergency situations when there is less time for comprehensive analysis of all full texts. It is therefore necessary to ensure that abstracts-as publications in miniature format-contain comprehensive and transparent information. The CONSORT statement for abstracts (CONSORT-A) offers guidelines to authors how to include all necessary information in an abstract. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the quality of reporting in medical research had already been the object of debate and criticism. The current crisis makes comprehensive documentation all the more important. Abstracts of COVID-19 RCTs should therefore report the criteria listed in the CONSORT-A statement fully and verifiably. The objective of this study is to check the completeness of abstracts of all COVID-19 RTCs published to date. Methods Based on a literature search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library, all publications up to 29 October 2020 are identified and examined in terms of the subject matter (reported results from COVID-19 studies) and their study design (RTC). Subsequently, suitable publications are examined for completeness and quality of abstracts. The CONSORT checklist for RTC abstracts serves as a basis in this procedure. The primary endpoint of the study is the percentage of correctly implemented items of the CONSORT statement for abstracts. The frequency of correct reporting of each individual item is checked in a second step. Discussion The study is expected to contribute to evaluating the reporting quality on COVID-19 studies, and specifically the completeness of abstracts of RTCs. It may thus support the assessment of current research into COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interventions to mitigate COVID-19 misinformation: protocol for a scoping review
    Kumar, Navin
    Walter, Nathan
    Nyhan, Kate
    Khoshnood, Kaveh
    Tucker, Joseph D.
    Bauch, Chris T.
    Ding, Qinglan
    Jones-Jang, S. Mo
    De Choudhury, Munmun
    Schwartz, Jason L.
    Papakyriakopoulos, Orestis
    Forastiere, Laura
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [32] Informing emergency care for COVID-19 patients: The COVID-19 Emergency Department Quality Improvement Project protocol
    O'Reilly, Gerard M.
    Mitchell, Rob D.
    Noonan, Michael P.
    Hiller, Ryan
    Mitra, Biswadev
    Brichko, Lisa
    Luckhoff, Carl
    Paton, Andrew
    Smit, De Villiers
    Santamaria, Mark J.
    Cameron, Peter A.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2020, 32 (03) : 511 - 514
  • [33] Post-COVID pain and quality of life in COVID-19 patients: protocol for a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Miao, Mengrong
    Xu, Yongxing
    Yang, Yitian
    Li, Pule
    Jia, Mengqi
    Wen, Zhaoyu
    Yu, Mengmeng
    Zhang, Jiaqiang
    Gu, Jianwen
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [34] Impact of COVID-19 on female fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Li, Fangyuan
    Lu, Hua
    Zhang, Qi
    Li, Xinyun
    Wang, Tong
    Liu, Qianchen
    Yang, Qian
    Qiang, Lingxia
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [35] Pregnancy, Preeclampsia, and COVID-19: Susceptibility and Mechanisms: A Review Study
    Sayad, Babak
    Afshar, Zeinab Mohseni
    Mansouri, Feizollah
    Salimi, Mehdi
    Miladi, Ronak
    Rahimi, Somayeh
    Rahimi, Zohreh
    Shirvani, Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2022, 16 (02) : 64 - 69
  • [36] COVID-19 challenges and changes for home care agencies and providers: a scoping review protocol
    Barr, Laura Lyn Barnes
    Christian, Robin
    Palokas, Michelle
    Hinton, Elizabeth
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (05) : 1385 - 1391
  • [37] Characteristics and quality of reporting qualitative nursing research related to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic search and critical review
    Vong, Ian-In
    Rothan-Tondeur, Monique
    Nohra, Rita Georges
    BMC NURSING, 2024, 23 (01):
  • [38] Indoor Air Quality and COVID-19: A Scoping Review
    Braggion, Axelle
    Dugerdil, Adeline
    Wilson, Olwen
    Hovagemyan, Francesca
    Flahault, Antoine
    PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS, 2024, 44
  • [39] Improving the quality of care in pregnancy and childbirth with coronavirus (COVID-19): a systematic review
    Abdollahpour, Sedigheh
    Khadivzadeh, Talat
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (08) : 1601 - 1609
  • [40] Machine Learning on the COVID-19 Pandemic, Human Mobility and Air Quality: A Review
    Rahman, Md. Mokhlesur
    Paul, Kamal Chandra
    Hossain, Md. Amjad
    Ali, G. G. Md. Nawaz
    Rahman, Md. Shahinoor
    Thill, Jean-Claude
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 72420 - 72450