Validation of the QualiPresc instrument for assessing the quality of drug prescription writing in primary health care

被引:2
作者
Batista, Almaria Mariz [1 ,2 ,4 ]
da Silva Gama, Zenewton Andre [3 ]
Souza, Dyego [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Norte, Escola Multicampi Ciencias Med, Caico, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Norte, Programa Posgrad Ciencias Saude, Natal, RN, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Norte, Dept Saude Colet, Natal, RN, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Norte, Escola Multicampi Ciencias Med Rio Grande do Nort, Caico, RN, Brazil
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 05期
关键词
CONTENT VALIDITY; SAFETY; INDICATORS; AGREEMENT; INTERVENTIONS; FREQUENCY; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0267707
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Adverse events related to drug prescriptions are the main patient safety issue in primary care; however there is a lack of validated instruments for assessing the quality of prescription writing, which covers the prescriber, the patient and the drug information. Objective To develop and validate the QualiPresc instrument to assess and monitor the quality of drug prescriptions in primary care, accompanied by a self-instruction direction, with the goal of filling the gap in validated instruments to assess the quality of prescription writing. Methodology A validation study conducted in a municipality in Northeastern Brazil, based on prescriptions prepared in January 2021 by physicians assigned to 18 Basic Health Units and filed in 6 distribution/dispensing units. Four steps were covered: 1) Analysis of content validity of each indicator (relevance and adequacy); 2) Analysis of reliability via intra and inter-rater agreement of each indicator; 3) Analysis of the utility of each indicator; 4) Construction and analysis of the reliability of a weighted composite indicator based on effectiveness and safety scores for each indicator. Results Twenty-nine potential indicators were listed, but only 13 were approved for validity, reliability and usefulness. Twelve indicators were excluded because of validity (<90% validity index) and four because they were not useful in the context of the study. Three weighted composite indicators were tested, but only one was approved for reliability and usefulness. The validated instrument therefore contains 13 indicators and 1 weighted composite indicator. Conclusion This study demonstrates the validity, reliability and usefulness of QualiPresc for the evaluation of prescription writing in the context of primary care. Application to contexts such as secondary care and tertiary care requires cross-cultural adaptation and new content validity. Educators, managers and health care professionals can access QualiPresc online, free of charge, to assess performance and provide feedback involving drug prescribers.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Completeness and Legibility of Handwritten Prescriptions in Sana'a, Yemen
    Al-Worafi, Yaser Mohammed
    Patel, Rahul P.
    Zaidi, Syed Tabish Razi
    Alseragi, Wafa Mohammed
    Almutairi, Masaad Saeed
    Alkhoshaiban, Ali Saleh
    Ming, Long Chiau
    [J]. MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2018, 27 (03) : 290 - 292
  • [2] Is it possible to measure prescribing quality using only prescription data?
    Andersen, M
    [J]. BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 98 (03) : 314 - 319
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1993, How to investigate drug use in health facilities: selected drug use indicators
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, MED RAT US MED
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2021, B ISMP BRAS, V10, P1
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2002, RESOLUCAO WHA55 18 A
  • [7] Development of prescribing-safety indicators for GPs using the RAND Appropriateness Method
    Avery, Anthony J.
    Dex, Grant M.
    Mulvaney, Caroline
    Serumaga, Brian
    Spencer, Rachel
    Lester, Helen E.
    Campbell, Stephen M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2011, 61 (589) : e526 - e536
  • [8] A critical review of scoring options for clinical measurement tools
    Avila M.L.
    Stinson J.
    Kiss A.
    Brandão L.R.
    Uleryk E.
    Feldman B.M.
    [J]. BMC Research Notes, 8 (1)
  • [9] WHAT CONSTITUTES GOOD PRESCRIBING
    BARBER, N
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6984) : 923 - 925
  • [10] The problem with composite indicators
    Barclay, Matthew
    Dixon-Woods, Mary
    Lyratzopoulos, Georgios
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2019, 28 (04) : 338 - 344