Identifying the sectors involved in the European public health emergency preparedness and response: a systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Kamga, L. S. Kengne [1 ,2 ]
Voordouw, A. C. G. [3 ]
de Vries, M. C. [3 ]
Belfroid, E. [1 ]
Koopmans, M. [4 ]
Timen, A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Infect Dis Control, Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ, Athena Inst Res Innovat & Commun Hlth & Life Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Ctr Infect Dis Res, Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, Diagnost & Lab Surveillance, Bilthoven, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Virol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 11期
关键词
Public health; Health policy; Risk management; EXPERTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062624
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesA systematic review was conducted with the aims of identifying sectors mentioned in the public health emergency preparedness and response (PHEPR) literature and mapping the involvement of those sectors in the seven PHEPR cycle domains. SettingA detailed search strategy was conducted in Embase and Scopus, covering the period between 1 January 2005 and 1 January 2020. MethodsPublished articles focusing on preparedness for and/or response to public health emergencies of multiple origins on the European continent were included. The frequency with which predetermined sectors were mentioned when describing collaboration during the preparedness and response cycle was determined. ResultsThe results show that description of the involvement of sectors in PHEPR in general and collaboration during PHEPR is predominantly confined to a limited number of sectors, namely 'Governmental institutions', 'Human health industry', 'Experts' and 'Civil Society'. Description is also limited to only three domains of the PHEPR cycle, namely 'Risk and crisis management', 'Pre-event preparations and governance' and 'Surveillance'. ConclusionsOptimal preparedness and response require predefined collaboration with a broader scope of partners than currently seems to be the case based on this literature review. We recommend considering these outcomes when planning multisectoral collaboration during preparedness and response, as well as the need to further operationalise the term 'multisectoral collaboration' during PHEPRs. PROSPERO registration numberPROSPERO with registration number 176331.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Monkeypox: balancing response and future preparedness during a global public health emergency
    Thornton, Ian
    Gandhi, Gian
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2022, 7 (10):
  • [2] Achieving public health legal preparedness: how dissonant views on public health law threaten emergency preparedness and response
    Botoseneanu, Anda
    Wu, Helen
    Wasserman, Jeffrey
    Jacobson, Peter D.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 33 (03) : 361 - 368
  • [3] Water supply emergency preparedness and response in health care facilities: A systematic review on international evidence
    van der Heijden, Sophie
    Cassivi, Alexandra
    Mayer, Aljoscha
    Sandholz, Simone
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [4] Information intermediaries for emergency preparedness and response: A case study from public health
    Minu Ipe
    T. S. Raghu
    Ajay Vinze
    Information Systems Frontiers, 2010, 12 : 67 - 79
  • [5] Emergency preparedness and bioterrorism response: Development of an educational program for public health personnel
    Baldwin, K
    LaMantia, J
    Proziack, L
    PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2005, 22 (03) : 248 - 253
  • [6] Information intermediaries for emergency preparedness and response: A case study from public health
    Ipe, Minu
    Raghu, T. S.
    Vinze, Ajay
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2010, 12 (01) : 67 - 79
  • [7] Exploring the Linkage Between Accreditation Outcomes and Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response
    Kennedy, Mallory
    Heffernan, Megan
    Gonick, Shannon A.
    Siegfried, Alexa L.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (01) : E80 - E84
  • [8] Assessing public health emergency preparedness: A scoping review on recent tools and methods
    Chiossi, Scott
    Tsolova, Svetla
    Ciotti, Massimo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 56
  • [9] Digital Democracy and Emergency Preparedness: Engaging the Public in Public Health
    Spitale, Giovanni
    Biller-Andorno, Nikola
    Germani, Federico
    Merten, Sonja
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 69
  • [10] A systematic literature review on public health and healthcare resources for pandemic preparedness planning
    Beishuizen, Berend H. H.
    Stein, Mart L.
    Buis, Joeri S.
    Tostmann, Alma
    Green, Caroline
    Duggan, Jim
    Connolly, Maire A.
    Rovers, Chantal P.
    Timen, Aura
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)