Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging

被引:83
作者
Sogani, Julie [1 ]
Morris, Elizabeth A. [2 ]
Kaplan, Jennifer B. [1 ]
D'Alessio, Donna [1 ]
Goldman, Debra [3 ]
Moskowitz, Chaya S. [3 ]
Jochelson, Maxine S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Imaging, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FIBROGLANDULAR TISSUE; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; CANCER RISK; AROMATASE INHIBITORS; BASE-LINE; FOLLOW-UP; IMPACT; DENSITY; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2016160284
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the extent of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at contrast material-enhanced (CE) spectral mammography and breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, to evaluate interreader agreement in BPE assessment, and to examine the relationships between clinical factors and BPE. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study. Two hundred seventy-eight women from 25 to 76 years of age with increased breast cancer risk who underwent CE spectral mammography and MR imaging for screening or staging from 2010 through 2014 were included. Three readers independently rated BPE on CE spectral mammographic and MR images with the ordinal scale: minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. To assess pairwise agreement between BPE levels on CE spectral mammographic and MR images and among readers, weighted k coefficients with quadratic weights were calculated. For overall agreement, mean k values and bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The univariate and multivariate associations between BPE and clinical factors were examined by using generalized estimating equations separately for CE spectral mammography and MR imaging. Results: Most women had minimal or mild BPE at both CE spectral mammography (68%-76%) and MR imaging (69%-76%). Between CE spectral mammography and MR imaging, the intrareader agreement ranged from moderate to substantial (k = 0.55-0.67). Overall agreement on BPE levels between CE spectral mammography and MR imaging and among readers was substantial (k = 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.61, 0.70). With both modalities, BPE demonstrated significant association with menopausal status, prior breast radiation therapy, hormonal treatment, breast density on CE spectral mammographic images, and amount of fibroglandular tissue on MR images (P < 001 for all). Conclusion: There was substantial agreement between readers for BPE detected on CE spectral mammographic and MR images. (C) RSNA 2017
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 73
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Arkani S, 2006, SAN ANT BREAST CANC
[2]   QUANTITATIVE CLASSIFICATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITIES AND BREAST-CANCER RISK - RESULTS FROM THE CANADIAN NATIONAL BREAST SCREENING STUDY [J].
BOYD, NF ;
BYNG, JW ;
JONG, RA ;
FISHELL, EK ;
LITTLE, LE ;
MILLER, AB ;
LOCKWOOD, GA ;
TRITCHLER, DL ;
YAFFE, MJ .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (09) :670-675
[3]  
Bryce Y, 2015, RAD SOC N AM SCI ASS, P203
[4]  
Cubuk R, 2010, RADIOL MED, V115, P434, DOI 10.1007/s11547-010-0513-4
[5]   Physiologic changes in breast magnetic resonance imaging during the menstrual cycle: Perfusion imaging, signal enhancement, and influence of the T1 relaxation time of breast tissue [J].
Delille, JP ;
Slanetz, PJ ;
Yeh, ED ;
Kopans, DB ;
Garrido, L .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (04) :236-241
[6]   Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI: Impact on Diagnostic Performance [J].
DeMartini, Wendy B. ;
Liu, Franklin ;
Peacock, Sue ;
Eby, Peter R. ;
Gutierrez, Robert L. ;
Lehman, Constance D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (04) :W373-W380
[7]   Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography [J].
Diekmann, Felix ;
Bick, Ulrich .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (12) :3086-3092
[8]   Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography [J].
Diekmann, Felix ;
Freyer, Martin ;
Diekmann, Susanne ;
Fallenberg, Eva M. ;
Fischer, Thomas ;
Bick, Ulrich ;
Poellinger, Alexander .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 78 (01) :112-121
[9]   Are Qualitative Assessments of Background Parenchymal Enhancement, Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue on MR Images, and Mammographic Density Associated with Breast Cancer Risk? [J].
Dontchos, Brian N. ;
Rahbar, Habib ;
Partridge, Savannah C. ;
Korde, Larissa A. ;
Lam, Diana L. ;
Scheel, John R. ;
Peacock, Sue ;
Lehman, Constance D. .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 276 (02) :371-380
[10]   Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results [J].
Dromain, Clarisse ;
Thibault, Fabienne ;
Muller, Serge ;
Rimareix, Francoise ;
Delaloge, Suzette ;
Tardivon, Anne ;
Balleyguier, Corinne .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (03) :565-574