Who influences windpower licensing decisions in Norway? Formal requirements and informal practices

被引:32
作者
Inderberg, Tor Hakon Jackson [1 ]
Rognstad, Helga [1 ]
Saglie, Inger-Lise [2 ]
Gulbrandsen, Lars H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fridtjof Nansen Inst Polhogda, POB 326, N-1326 Lysaker, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Inst Urban & Reg Planning, POB 5003 NMBU, N-1432 As, Norway
关键词
Windpower licencing; Formal regulations; Informal practices; Transparency; Predictability; WIND POWER; ENERGY; DENMARK; SWEDEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Licensing processes for renewable electricity plants have been surprisingly little studied. Yet, how public and private stakeholders influence the process, formally and informally, is crucial to the outcome of the licensing decision. This article analyses how the organisation of the Norwegian windpower licensing process affects actor influence, and the consequences for licensing outcomes as well as the transparency and predictability of the process. Drawing on licence application and decision documents, official regulations, policy documents and reports, as well as research papers, media articles and 19 interviews, we map and discuss formal rules and informal practices. Changes in regulations and organisation of the licensing process, along with locating the licensing body within a sector authority instead of generalised planning, have given the licensing body considerable room for decisional discretion. This gives rise to the issue of transparency, where the grounds for the licensing outcome and the weighting of various factors are unclear, and also makes it difficult to predict the results for similar projects. We argue that the superficial impression of a centrally driven and controlled process should be modified somewhat, as some local stakeholders have more influence on the licensing outcome than is immediately apparent.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 191
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[41]  
South Trondelag County Council, 2008, FYLK VINDKR SOR TRON
[42]  
Tennoy A., 2014, KONSEKVENSUTREDNINGE, P185
[43]  
Tesli A., 2014, KONSEKVENSUTREDNINGE, P54
[44]   Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990 [J].
Thornton, PH ;
Ocasio, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1999, 105 (03) :801-843
[45]   Key criteria for sustainable wind energy planning-lessons from an institutional perspective on the impact assessment literature [J].
Thygesen, Janne ;
Agarwal, Abhishek .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 39 :1012-1023
[46]   Wind power in UK and Denmark: Can rational choice help explain different outcomes? [J].
Toke, Dave .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2002, 11 (04) :83-100
[47]   Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? [J].
Toke, David ;
Breukers, Sylvia ;
Wolsink, Maarten .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2008, 12 (04) :1129-1147
[48]   Aiming to be Environmental Leaders, but Struggling to go Forward: Sweden and Norway on Energy System Transformation [J].
Ydersbond, Inga Margrete .
RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH CONFERENCE, RERC 2014, 2014, 58 :16-23
[49]  
1984, AM POLIT SCI REV, V78, P734