Who influences windpower licensing decisions in Norway? Formal requirements and informal practices

被引:32
作者
Inderberg, Tor Hakon Jackson [1 ]
Rognstad, Helga [1 ]
Saglie, Inger-Lise [2 ]
Gulbrandsen, Lars H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fridtjof Nansen Inst Polhogda, POB 326, N-1326 Lysaker, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Inst Urban & Reg Planning, POB 5003 NMBU, N-1432 As, Norway
关键词
Windpower licencing; Formal regulations; Informal practices; Transparency; Predictability; WIND POWER; ENERGY; DENMARK; SWEDEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Licensing processes for renewable electricity plants have been surprisingly little studied. Yet, how public and private stakeholders influence the process, formally and informally, is crucial to the outcome of the licensing decision. This article analyses how the organisation of the Norwegian windpower licensing process affects actor influence, and the consequences for licensing outcomes as well as the transparency and predictability of the process. Drawing on licence application and decision documents, official regulations, policy documents and reports, as well as research papers, media articles and 19 interviews, we map and discuss formal rules and informal practices. Changes in regulations and organisation of the licensing process, along with locating the licensing body within a sector authority instead of generalised planning, have given the licensing body considerable room for decisional discretion. This gives rise to the issue of transparency, where the grounds for the licensing outcome and the weighting of various factors are unclear, and also makes it difficult to predict the results for similar projects. We argue that the superficial impression of a centrally driven and controlled process should be modified somewhat, as some local stakeholders have more influence on the licensing outcome than is immediately apparent.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 191
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]   A "delivery-democracy dilemma'? Mapping and explaining policy change for public engagement with energy infrastructure [J].
Cowell, Richard ;
Devine-Wright, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2018, 20 (04) :499-517
[12]  
Devine-Wright P., 2011, DELIV LOW CARBON ELE
[13]  
ENDS Europe, 2018, WIND POW INV DESP FA
[14]  
Fauchald Ole Kristian., 2018, KONSESJONSPROSESSEN
[15]   Public perceptions of wind energy developments: Case studies from New Zealand [J].
Graham, Jessica B. ;
Stephenson, Janet R. ;
Smith, Inga J. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (09) :3348-3357
[16]   STRUCTURAL INERTIA AND ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE [J].
HANNAN, MT ;
FREEMAN, J .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1984, 49 (02) :149-164
[17]  
Holth F., 2014, KONSEKVENSUTREDNINGE, P19
[18]  
IEA, 2017, Energy policies of IEA countries: Norway 2017 review
[19]  
Inderberg T.H.J., 2015, ADAPT CHALL CLIM CHA, DOI [10.1017/cbo9781139149389.013, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139149389.013]
[20]   Advanced metering policy development and influence structures: The case of Norway [J].
Inderberg, Tor Hakon .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 81 :98-105