Impact of Precision Medicine in Diverse Cancers: A Meta-Analysis of Phase II Clinical Trials

被引:328
作者
Schwaederle, Maria [1 ]
Zhao, Melissa [1 ]
Lee, J. Jack [2 ]
Eggermont, Alexander M. [4 ,5 ]
Schilsky, Richard L. [3 ,5 ]
Mendelsohn, John [2 ,5 ]
Lazar, Vladimir [4 ,5 ]
Kurzrock, Razelle [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Ctr Personalized Canc Therapy, Moores Canc Ctr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Amer Soc Clin Oncol, Alexandria, VA USA
[4] Univ Paris 11, Inst Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
[5] Worldwide Innovat Network Personalized Canc Med, Villejuif, France
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CELL LUNG-CANCER; CHRONIC MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; TARGETED THERAPY; SOLID TUMORS; MELANOMA; MUTATIONS; GEFITINIB; SURVIVAL; IMATINIB;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5997
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The impact of a personalized cancer treatment strategy (ie, matching patients with drugs based on specific biomarkers) is still a matter of debate. Methods We reviewed phase II single-agent studies (570 studies; 32,149 patients) published between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2012 (PubMed search). Response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared for arms that used a personalized strategy versus those that did not. Results Multivariable analysis (both weighted multiple linear regression and random effects meta-regression) demonstrated that the personalized approach, compared with a nonpersonalized approach, consistently and independently correlated with higher median RR (31% v 10.5%, respectively; P < .001) and prolonged median PFS (5.9 v 2.7 months, respectively; P < .001) and OS (13.7 v 8.9 months, respectively; P < .001). Nonpersonalized targeted arms had poorer outcomes compared with either personalized targeted therapy or cytotoxics, with median RR of 4%, 30%, and 11.9%, respectively; median PFS of 2.6, 6.9, and 3.3 months, respectively (all P < .001); and median OS of 8.7, 15.9, and 9.4 months, respectively (all P < .05). Personalized arms using a genomic biomarker had higher median RR and prolonged median PFS and OS (all P <= .05) compared with personalized arms using a protein biomarker. A personalized strategy was associated with a lower treatment-related death rate than a nonpersonalized strategy (median, 1.5% v 2.3%, respectively; P < .001). Conclusion Comprehensive analysis of phase II, single-agent arms revealed that, across malignancies, a personalized strategy was an independent predictor of better outcomes and fewer toxic deaths. In addition, nonpersonalized targeted therapies were associated with significantly poorer outcomes than cytotoxic agents, which in turn were worse than personalized targeted therapy. (C) 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:3817 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Review of the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Gefitinib
    Araki, Takuya
    Yashima, Hideaki
    Shimizu, Kimihiro
    Aomori, Tohru
    Hashita, Tadahiro
    Kaira, Kyoichi
    Nakamura, Tomonori
    Yamamoto, Koujirou
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 6
  • [2] Complete molecular remission in chronic myelogenous leukemia after imatinib therapy
    Barbany, G
    Höglund, M
    Simonsson, B
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (07) : 539 - 540
  • [3] Are Companion Diagnostics Useful?
    Barrett, J. Carl
    Frigault, Melanie M.
    Hollingsworth, Simon
    Miller, Glenn A.
    Modur, Vijay
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 59 (01) : 198 - 201
  • [4] Imatinib and chronic-phase leukemias
    Boros, LG
    Lee, WP
    Cascante, M
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (01) : 67 - 68
  • [5] Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation
    Chapman, Paul B.
    Hauschild, Axel
    Robert, Caroline
    Haanen, John B.
    Ascierto, Paolo
    Larkin, James
    Dummer, Reinhard
    Garbe, Claus
    Testori, Alessandro
    Maio, Michele
    Hogg, David
    Lorigan, Paul
    Lebbe, Celeste
    Jouary, Thomas
    Schadendorf, Dirk
    Ribas, Antoni
    O'Day, Steven J.
    Sosman, Jeffrey A.
    Kirkwood, John M.
    Eggermont, Alexander M. M.
    Dreno, Brigitte
    Nolop, Keith
    Li, Jiang
    Nelson, Betty
    Hou, Jeannie
    Lee, Richard J.
    Flaherty, Keith T.
    McArthur, Grant A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (26) : 2507 - 2516
  • [6] New approaches to molecular cancer therapeutics
    Collins, Ian
    Workman, Paul
    [J]. NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 2 (12) : 689 - 700
  • [7] Dalle S, 2011, NEW ENGL J MED, V365, P1448, DOI 10.1056/NEJMc1108651
  • [8] The Genetic Basis for Cancer Treatment Decisions
    Dancey, Janet E.
    Bedard, Philippe L.
    Onetto, Nicole
    Hudson, Thomas J.
    [J]. CELL, 2012, 148 (03) : 409 - 420
  • [9] Personalized Cancer Medicine: Molecular Diagnostics, Predictive Biomarkers, and Drug Resistance
    de Castro, D. Gonzalez
    Clarke, P. A.
    Al-Lazikani, B.
    Workman, P.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 93 (03) : 252 - 259
  • [10] Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update
    DerSimonian, Rebecca
    Kacker, Raghu
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 28 (02) : 105 - 114