Acupuncture and moxibustion for lateral elbow pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

被引:34
作者
Gadau, Marcus [1 ]
Yeung, Wing-Fai [2 ]
Liu, Hua [3 ]
Zaslawski, Chris [4 ]
Tan, Yuan-Sheng [5 ]
Wang, Fu-Chun [6 ]
Bangrazi, Sergio [7 ]
Chung, Ka-Fai [2 ]
Bian, Zhao-Xiang [1 ]
Zhang, Shi-Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Sch Chinese Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Psychiat, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] North Sichuan Med Coll, Clin Med Coll 2, Dept Neurol, Nanchong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Technol Sydney, Coll Tradit Chinese Med, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[5] World Federat Acupuncture & Moxibust Soc, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Changchun Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[7] Inst Paracelso, Rome, Italy
来源
BMC COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE | 2014年 / 14卷
关键词
Epicondylitis; Tennis elbow; Randomized Controlled Trials ( RCTs); STRICTA; PRISMA; Cochrane risk of bias tool; Chinese literature; COLLAGEN-INDUCED ARTHRITIS; TENNIS ELBOW; CHRONIC EPICONDYLITIS; MEDIATE;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6882-14-136
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Background: Acupuncture and moxibustion have widely been used to treat lateral elbow pain (LEP). A comprehensive systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including both English and Chinese databases was conducted to assess the efficacy of acupuncture and moxibustion in the treatment of LEP. Methods: Revised STRICTA (2010) criteria were used to appraise the acupuncture procedures, the Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. A total of 19 RCTs that compared acupuncture and/or moxibustion with sham acupuncture, another form of acupuncture, or conventional treatment were included. Results: All studies had at least one domain rated as high risk or uncertain risk of bias in the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results from three RCTs of moderate quality showed that acupuncture was more effective than sham acupuncture. Results from 10 RCTs of mostly low quality showed that acupuncture or moxibustion was superior or equal to conventional treatment, such as local anesthetic injection, local steroid injection, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or ultrasound. There were six low quality RCTs that compared acupuncture and moxibustion combined with manual acupuncture alone, and all showed that acupuncture and moxibustion combined was superior to manual acupuncture alone. Conclusion: Moderate quality studies suggest that acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture. Interpretations of findings regarding acupuncture vs. conventional treatment, and acupuncture and moxibustion combined vs. manual acupuncture alone are limited by the methodological qualities of these studies. Future studies with improved methodological design are warranted to confirm the efficacy of acupuncture and moxibustion for LEP.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   PREVALENCE, INCIDENCE, AND REMISSION RATES OF SOME COMMON RHEUMATIC DISEASES OR SYNDROMES [J].
ALLANDER, E .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1974, 3 (03) :145-153
[2]  
[Anonymous], JILIN CHIN MED J
[3]  
[Anonymous], CHINA FOREIGN MED TR
[4]  
[Anonymous], CLIN ACUPUNCT J
[5]  
[Anonymous], SCI TECHNOL INF J
[6]  
[Anonymous], ZHEJIANG J TRADIT CH
[7]  
[Anonymous], CHIN J TRADIT CHIN M
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2013, V, DOI [DOI 10.1155/2013/710175, DOI 10.1155/2013/430851]
[9]  
[Anonymous], SHANDONG MED J
[10]  
[Anonymous], SHANDONG CHIN MED J