A socio-eco-efficiency analysis of water and wastewater treatment processes for refugee communities in Jordan

被引:22
作者
Anwar, Siti Nurhawa Binte Muhammad [1 ]
Alvarado, Valeria [2 ]
Hsu, Shu-Chien [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Nanyang Environm & Water Res Inst, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Life cycle cost; Social life cycle assessment; Wastewater Treatment; Analytic Hierarchy Process; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; CAMPS; INDICATORS; SCARCITY; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105196
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As of 2017, the United Nations has estimated that there are 68.5 million displaced people in the world which live in refugee camps (RCs) in 125 host countries. RCs frequently encounter water scarcity issues which lead to a low daily limit of water consumption, as well as face management difficulties such as septic tank overflowing which contribute to the development of health problems. Considering the need for more sustainable water, sanitation, and hygiene system in RCs, a socio-eco-efficiency analysis (SEEA) framework is proposed for the analysis and comparison of different wastewater treatment methods. The SEEA framework consists of the integration of the economic and environmental aspects analysed by an eco-efficiency analysis (EEA) with the social aspects evaluated by a social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) using the analytic hierarchy process. The SEEA framework was applied to compare different wastewater treatment methods in Zaatari Refugee Camp in Jordan. The SEEA results show that, if adopted, an effluent water reuse-based treatment would increase economic efficiency by 75%, decrease environmental impacts by 57%, and increase social sustainability by 57% compared to the current operation of the camp, where a wastewater system connects groups of seven to nine households to communal septic tanks. A ternary diagram is used to represent the comparison of different wastewater treatment methods for an RC. The diagram shows the degree of socio-eco-efficiency of each wastewater treatment method, in terms of its social impacts, environmental impacts, and cost by normalising results of the EEA and S-LCA into one score.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Techno-economic and environmental assessment of wastewater management systems: Life cycle approach [J].
Abdallah, Mohamed ;
Shanableh, Abdallah ;
Elshazly, Doha ;
Feroz, Sainab .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2020, 82
[2]   Water scarcity impact of climate change in semi-arid regions: a case study in Mujib basin, Jordan [J].
Abu-Allaban, Mahmoud ;
El-Naqa, Ali ;
Jaber, Mohammed ;
Hammouri, Nezar .
ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2015, 8 (02) :951-959
[3]  
ACTED JEN OXFAM UNICEF UNHCR, 2014, ZAAT WAT NETW TECHN
[4]   Housing conditions in Palestinian refugee camps, Jordan [J].
Alnsour, Jamal ;
Meaton, Julia .
CITIES, 2014, 36 :65-73
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 2 10 2 DIR GLOB WARM
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, GDP PER CAP PPP CURR
[7]   Comparative life cycle energy and cost analysis of post-disaster temporary housings [J].
Atmaca, Adem ;
Atmaca, Nihat .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 171 :429-443
[8]   ON SOME USEFUL PROPERTIES OF THE PERRON EIGENVALUE OF A POSITIVE RECIPROCAL MATRIX IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
AUPETIT, B ;
GENEST, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1993, 70 (02) :263-268
[9]  
BASF, 2018, EC AN
[10]   Life cycle assessment (LCA) of urban water infrastructure: emerging approaches to balance objectives and inform comprehensive decision-making [J].
Byrne, Diana M. ;
Lohman, Hannah A. C. ;
Cook, Sherri M. ;
Peters, Gregory M. ;
Guest, Jeremy S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-WATER RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 3 (06) :1002-1014