Minimal residual disease in cancer therapy - Small things make all the difference

被引:36
作者
Blatter, Sohvi [1 ]
Rottenberg, Sven [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inst Anim Pathol, Vetsuisse Fac, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Mol Pathol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Minimal residual disease; Drug resistance; Drug tolerance; Genetically engineered mouse models; BRCA1; Cancer dormancy; Cancer stem cells; Autophagy; Microenvironment; TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITOR; MAMMARY-TUMORS; CHEMOTHERAPY RESISTANCE; DRUG-RESISTANCE; BREAST-CANCER; GROWTH-FACTOR; STEM-CELLS; MULTIDRUG-RESISTANCE; LUNG ADENOCARCINOMAS; ACQUIRED-RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.drup.2015.08.003
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a major hurdle in the eradication of malignant tumors. Despite the high sensitivity of various cancers to treatment, some residual cancer cells persist and lead to tumor recurrence and treatment failure. Obvious reasons for residual disease include mechanisms of secondary therapy resistance, such as the presence of mutant cells that are insensitive to the drugs, or the presence of cells that become drug resistant due to activation of survival pathways. In addition to such unambiguous resistance modalities, several patients with relapsing tumors do not show refractory disease and respond again when the initial therapy is repeated. These cases cannot be explained by the selection of mutant tumor cells, and the precise mechanisms underlying this clinical drug resistance are ill-defined. In the current review, we put special emphasis on cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms that may explain mechanisms of MRD that are independent of secondary therapy resistance. In particular, we show that studying genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs), which highly resemble the disease in humans, provides a complementary approach to understand MRD. In these animal models, specific mechanisms of secondary resistance can be excluded by targeted genetic modifications. This allows a clear distinction between the selection of cells with stable secondary resistance and mechanisms that result in the survival of residual cells but do not provoke secondary drug resistance. Mechanisms that may explain the latter feature include special biochemical defense properties of cancer stem cells, metabolic peculiarities such as the dependence on autophagy, drug-tolerant persisting cells, intratumoral heterogeneity, secreted factors from the microenvironment, tumor vascularization patterns and immunosurveillance-related factors. We propose in the current review that a common feature of these various mechanisms is cancer cell dormancy. Therefore, dormant cancer cells appear to be an important target in the attempt to eradicate residual cancer cells, and eventually cure patients who repeatedly respond to anticancer therapy but lack complete tumor eradication. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   Models, mechanisms and clinical evidence for cancer dormancy [J].
Aguirre-Ghiso, Julio A. .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2007, 7 (11) :834-846
[2]   Metronomics: towards personalized chemotherapy? [J].
Andre, Nicolas ;
Carre, Manon ;
Pasquier, Eddy .
NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 11 (07) :413-431
[3]   Targeting autophagy potentiates tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced cell death in Philadelphia chromosome-positive cells, including primary CML stem cells [J].
Bellodi, Cristian ;
Lidonnici, Maria Rosa ;
Hamilton, Ashley ;
Helgason, G. Vignir ;
Soliera, Angela Rachele ;
Ronchetti, Mattia ;
Galavotti, Sara ;
Young, Kenneth W. ;
Selmi, Tommaso ;
Yacobi, Rinat ;
Van Etten, Richard A. ;
Donato, Nick ;
Hunter, Ann ;
Dinsdale, David ;
Tirro, Elena ;
Vigneri, Paolo ;
Nicotera, Pierluigi ;
Dyer, Martin J. ;
Holyoake, Tessa ;
Salomoni, Paolo ;
Calabretta, Bruno .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2009, 119 (05) :1109-1123
[4]   Cancer drug pan-resistance: pumps, cancer stem cells, quiescence, epithelial to mesenchymal transition, blocked cell death pathways, persisters or what? [J].
Borst, Piet .
OPEN BIOLOGY, 2012, 2
[5]   Opinion - The role of apoptosis in cancer development and treatment response [J].
Brown, JM ;
Attardi, LD .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2005, 5 (03) :231-237
[6]   Tumour heterogeneity and the evolution of polyclonal drug resistance [J].
Burrell, Rebecca A. ;
Swanton, Charles .
MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY, 2014, 8 (06) :1095-1111
[7]   VEGF inhibitors in cancer therapy [J].
Cardones, AR ;
Bañez, LL .
CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2006, 12 (03) :387-394
[8]   A restricted cell population propagates glioblastoma growth after chemotherapy [J].
Chen, Jian ;
Li, Yanjiao ;
Yu, Tzong-Shiue ;
McKay, Renee M. ;
Burns, Dennis K. ;
Kernie, Steven G. ;
Parada, Luis F. .
NATURE, 2012, 488 (7412) :522-+
[9]   Pretreatment Mitochondrial Priming Correlates with Clinical Response to Cytotoxic Chemotherapy [J].
Chonghaile, Triona Ni ;
Sarosiek, Kristopher A. ;
Thanh-Trang Vo ;
Ryan, Jeremy A. ;
Tammareddi, Anupama ;
Moore, Victoria Del Gaizo ;
Deng, Jing ;
Anderson, Kenneth C. ;
Richardson, Paul ;
Tai, Yu-Tzu ;
Mitsiades, Constantine S. ;
Matulonis, Ursula A. ;
Drapkin, Ronny ;
Stone, Richard ;
DeAngelo, Daniel J. ;
McConkey, David J. ;
Sallan, Stephen E. ;
Silverman, Lewis ;
Hirsch, Michelle S. ;
Carrasco, Daniel Ruben ;
Letai, Anthony .
SCIENCE, 2011, 334 (6059) :1129-1133
[10]   The cancer stem cell: premises, promises and challenges [J].
Clevers, Hans .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2011, 17 (03) :313-319