BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes

被引:344
作者
Berry, DA
Iversen, ES
Gudbjartsson, DF
Hiller, EH
Garber, JE
Peshkin, BN
Lerman, C
Watson, P
Lynch, HT
Hilsenbeck, SG
Rubinstein, WS
Hughes, KS
Parmigiani, G
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Breast Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Inst Stat & Decis Sci, Durham, NC USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Surg Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[6] Lahey Clin Fdn, Burlington, MA USA
[7] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Lombardi Canc Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[8] Univ Penn, Ctr Canc, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[9] Creighton Univ, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
[10] Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Ctr Med Genet, Evanston, IL USA
[11] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
[12] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biostat, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2002.05.121
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare genetic test results for deleterious mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 with estimated probabilities of carrying such mutations; to assess sensitivity of genetic testing; and to assess the relevance of other susceptibility genes in familial breast and ovarian cancer. Patients and Methods: Data analyzed were from six high-risk genetic counseling clinics and concern individuals from families for which at least one member was tested for mutations at BRCA1 and BRCA2. Predictions of genetic predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer for 301 individuals were made using BRCAPRO, a statistical model and software using Mendelian genetics and Bayesian updating. Model predictions were compared with the results of genetic testing. Results: Among the test individuals, 126 were Ashkenazi Jewish, three were male subjects, 243 had breast cancer, 49 had ovarian cancer, 34 were unaffected, and 139 tested positive for BRCA1 mutations and 29 for BRCA2 mutations. BRCAPRO performed well: for the 150 probands with the smallest BRCAPRO carrier probabilities (average, 29.0%), the proportion testing positive was 32.7%; for the 151 probands with the largest carrier probabilities (average, 95.2%), 78.8% tested positive. Genetic testing sensitivity was estimated to be at least 85%, with false-negatives including mutations of susceptibility genes heretofore unknown. Conclusion: BRCAPRO is an accurate counseling tool for determining the probability of carrying mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Genetic testing for BRCA I and BRCA2 is highly sensitive, missing an estimated 15% of mutations. In the populations studied, breast cancer susceptibility genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 either do not exist, are rare, or are associated with low disease penetrance. (C) 2002 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2701 / 2712
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Probability of carrying a mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history
    Berry, DA
    Parmigiani, G
    Sanchez, J
    Schildkraut, J
    Winer, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (03) : 227 - 238
  • [2] Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2
    Bluman, LG
    Rimer, BK
    Berry, DA
    Borstelmann, N
    Iglehart, JD
    Regan, K
    Schildkraut, J
    Winer, EP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (03) : 1040 - 1046
  • [3] Effect of BRCA1 and BRCA2 on the association between breast cancer risk and family history
    Claus, EB
    Schildkraut, J
    Iversen, ES
    Berry, D
    Parmigiani, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (23) : 1824 - 1829
  • [4] CLAUS EB, 1991, AM J HUM GENET, V48, P232
  • [5] CLAUS EB, 1994, CANCER, V73, P643, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940201)73:3<643::AID-CNCR2820730323>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-5
  • [7] BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer
    Couch, FJ
    DeShano, ML
    Blackwood, MA
    Calzone, K
    Stopfer, J
    Campeau, L
    Ganguly, A
    Rebbeck, T
    Weber, BL
    Jablon, L
    Cobleigh, MA
    Hoskins, K
    Garber, JE
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (20) : 1409 - 1415
  • [8] Germ-line BRCA1 mutations in Jewish and non-Jewish women with early-onset breast cancer
    FitzGerald, MG
    MacDonald, DJ
    Krainer, M
    Hoover, I
    ONeil, E
    Unsal, H
    SilvaArrieto, S
    Finkelstein, DM
    BeerRomero, P
    Englert, C
    Sgroi, DC
    Smith, BL
    Younger, JW
    Garber, JE
    Duda, RB
    Mayzel, KA
    Isselbacher, KJ
    Friend, SH
    Haber, DA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (03) : 143 - 149
  • [9] FORD D, 1995, AM J HUM GENET, V57, P1457
  • [10] Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families
    Ford, D
    Easton, DF
    Stratton, M
    Narod, S
    Goldgar, D
    Devilee, P
    Bishop, DT
    Weber, B
    Lenoir, G
    Chang-Claude, J
    Sobol, H
    Teare, MD
    Struewing, J
    Arason, A
    Scherneck, S
    Peto, J
    Rebbeck, TR
    Tonin, P
    Neuhausen, S
    Barkardottir, R
    Eyfjord, J
    Lynch, H
    Ponder, BAJ
    Gayther, SA
    Birch, JM
    Lindblom, A
    Stoppa-Lyonnet, D
    Bignon, Y
    Borg, A
    Hamann, U
    Haites, N
    Scott, RJ
    Maugard, CM
    Vasen, H
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1998, 62 (03) : 676 - 689