A method to estimate the depth of the sciatic nerve during subgluteal block by using thigh diameter as a guide

被引:4
作者
Crabtree, Eric C.
Beck, Marc
Lopp, Brian R.
Nosovitch, Mace
Edwards, John N.
Boezaart, Andre P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Anesthesia, RASCI, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Radiol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
sciatic nerve depth; sciatic nerve block; subgluteal block; regional;
D O I
10.1016/j.rapm.2006.03.005
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: The subgluteal approach is common for sciatic nerve block. Although the surface landmarks are clear, the depth of this nerve at this level is difficult to judge. The purpose of this study is to establish a method of estimating the sciatic nerve depth using the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the thigh as a marker. Methods: The study was undertaken in 2 phases. Phase I entailed review of 100 magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the pelvis and proximal lower extremity of patients. Measurements were taken of the AP diameter of the thigh at the midpoint of the lesser trochanter and then compared with distances of the sciatic nerves from the skin of the posterior aspect of the thigh at the same level. Phase 2 involved enrolling 40 patients undergoing lower-extremity surgery for whom subgluteal sciatic nerve blocks were indicated. The AP diameters of the thighs were measured from the subgluteal groove to the inguinal groove with the patient in the supine position. Placing the patient in the lateral position, the subgluteal sciatic block was then performed by using a stimulating needle. The distances from the skin at which the sciatic nerves were actually found, as estimated by maximum motor response to stimulus, were noted. Results: Phase 1 showed a mean AP diameter of 18.94 cm +/- 2.61 cm (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]), mean nerve depth of 6.51 cm +/- 1.46 cur (mean +/- SD), and a linear regression slope of 0.48. Phase 2 showed a mean AT diameter of 16.28 cm +/- 2.73cm (mean SD), a mean nerve depth of 6.99 cm +/- 1.39 cm (mean +/- SD), and a linear regression slope of 0.43. The thigh diameters differed (P <.001) between the groups, but there was no difference in the depth to the sciatic nerve between the 2 groups (P =.07). Conclusions: Comparing phase I and phase 2 datasets shows the slopes of linear regression lines are nearly parallel. The clinical data from phase 2 verify the anatomical data collected in phase I and show that the sciatic nerve depth to AT diameter ratio is 0.43 or the depth of the sciatic nerve is approximately 43% of thigh diameter if the patient is positioned in the lateral decubitus position.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 362
页数:5
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] A new posterior approach to the sciatic nerve block: A prospective, randomized comparison with the classic posterior approach
    de Benedetto, P
    Bertini, L
    Casati, A
    Borghi, B
    Albertin, A
    Fanelli, G
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 93 (04) : 1040 - 1044
  • [2] Posterior subgluteal approach to block the sciatic nerve: description of the technique and initial clinical experiences
    Di Benedetto, P
    Casati, A
    Bertini, L
    Fanelli, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 19 (09) : 682 - 686
  • [3] Nerve stimulator-assisted evoked motor response predicts the latency and success of a single-injection sciatic block
    Sukhani, R
    Nader, A
    Candido, KD
    Doty, R
    Benzon, HT
    Yaghmour, E
    Kendall, M
    McCarthy, R
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (02) : 584 - 588
  • [4] The effects of three different approaches on the onset time of sciatic nerve blocks with 0.75% ropivacaine
    Taboada, M
    Alvarez, J
    Cortés, J
    Rodríguez, J
    Rabanal, S
    Gude, F
    Atanassoff, A
    Atanassoff, PG
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 98 (01) : 242 - 247