Comparative susceptibility of indigenous and improved pig breeds to Classical swine fever virus infection:: Practical and epidemiological implications in a subsistence-based, developing country setting

被引:17
作者
Blacksell, S. D. [1 ]
Khounsy, S.
Van Aken, D.
Gleeson, L. J.
Westbury, H. A.
机构
[1] CSIRO, Australian Anim Hlth Lab, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Dept Microbiol & Parasitol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Minist Agr & Forestry, Dept Livestock & Fisheries, Viangchan, Laos
[4] European Union Strengthening Livestock Serv Proj, Viangchan, Laos
关键词
Classical swine fever; Laos; Asia; smallholder; native breed; comparative susceptibility;
D O I
10.1007/s11250-006-4434-0
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study investigated the comparative susceptibility of indigenous Moo Laat and improved Large White/Landrace pig breeds to infection with classical swine fever virus (CSFV) under controlled conditions in the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR). The Moo Laat (ML) and Large White/Landrace crossbreed (LWC) pigs were inoculated with a standard challenge strain designated Lao/Kham225 (infectivity titre of 10(2.75) TCID50/ml). The results demonstrated that both the native breed and an improved pig breed are fully susceptible to CSFV infection and the mortality rate is high. LWC pigs demonstrated lower (or shorter) survival times (50% survival time: 11 days), earlier and higher pyrexia and earlier onset of viraemia compared to ML pigs (50% survival time: 18 days). In the context of village-based pig production, the longer time from infection to death in native ML pigs means that incubating or early sick pigs are likely to be sold once an outbreak of CSF is recognized in a village. This increased longevity probably contributes to the maintenance and spread of disease in a population where generally the contact rate is low.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 474
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Genetic typing of classical swine fever viruses from Lao PDR by analysis of the 5′ non-coding region [J].
Blacksell, SD ;
Khounsy, S ;
Boyle, DB ;
Gleeson, LJ ;
Westbury, HA ;
Mackenzie, JS .
VIRUS GENES, 2005, 31 (03) :349-355
[2]   Phylogenetic analysis of the E2 gene of classical swine fever viruses from Lao PDR [J].
Blacksell, SD ;
Khounsy, S ;
Boyle, DB ;
Greiser-Wilke, I ;
Gleeson, LJ ;
Westbury, HA ;
Mackenzie, JS .
VIRUS RESEARCH, 2004, 104 (01) :87-92
[3]  
BRUGH M, 1964, AM J VET RES, V25, P1124
[4]   An improved ELISA for the detection of serum antibodies directed against classical swine fever virus [J].
Colijn, EO ;
Bloemraad, M ;
Wensvoort, G .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 59 (01) :15-25
[5]  
DEPNER K, 1994, WIEN TIERARZTL MONAT, V81, P370
[6]  
Depner K. R., 1996, European Journal of Veterinary Pathology, V2, P61
[7]   Influence of breed-related factors on the course of classical swine fever virus infection [J].
Depner, KR ;
Hinrichs, U ;
Bickhardt, K ;
GreiserWilke, I ;
Pohlenz, J ;
Moennig, V ;
Liess, B .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1997, 140 (19) :506-507
[8]  
JENSEN MH, 1981, ACTA VET SCAND, V22, P85
[9]   Experimental infection of slaughter pigs with classical swine fever virus: transmission of the virus, course of the disease and antibody response [J].
Laevens, H ;
Koenen, F ;
Deluyker, H ;
de Kruif, A .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1999, 145 (09) :243-248
[10]  
Laevens H, 1998, VET QUART, V20, P41