Comparision of photo pulse plethysmography module with Mobil-O-graph for measurement of pulse wave velocity

被引:5
|
作者
Kumar, A. V. Siva [1 ]
MaheshKumar, K. [2 ]
Maruthy, K. N. [3 ]
Padmavathi, R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Sri Ramachandra Med Coll & Res Inst, Dept Physiol, Chennai 600116, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Govt Yoga & Naturopathy Coll & Hosp, Dept Physiol & Biochem, Chennai 600104, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Narayana Med Coll, Dept Physiol, Nellore 524003, Andhra Pradesh, India
[4] SRIHER, Sri Ramachandra Med Coll & Reserach Inst, Dept Physiol, Chennai 600116, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH | 2021年 / 9卷
关键词
Pulse wave velocity; Photo pulse plethysmography; Pulse transit time; CENTRAL BLOOD-PRESSURE; ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; VALIDATION; SPHYGMOCOR; ARTERIOGRAPH; COMPLIOR; DEVICE; ECG;
D O I
10.1016/j.cegh.2020.09.001
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction:Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an indicator of arterial stiffness and one of the prognostic tools in clinical practice. We compared the finger photo pulse plethysmography (PPG) module with the Mobil-O-Graph for assessment of PWV. Material and methods: 80 healthy subjects and patients have participated in this study, among them, 42 were males, and 38 were females. Recording for the subjects was executed between 9, and 11 a.m., after a light breakfast. Lead - II ECG along with PPG were recorded in dual channel AD converter and Mobil-O-Graph simultaneously. The analogue signals of both the devices of the AD converter were digitized by using the sound card of the computer for the measurement of Pulse Transit Time [PTT]. Results: The mean age of the participants was 41.5 +/- 5.48 and BMI-26.42 +/- 5.80. PWV values measured by the devices were similar (P > 0.05). There is a significant positive correlation of PWV between PPG and Mobil O graph, r-0.92 (p = 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis indicated that a mean difference for PWV is .0.3 m/s, which is limits of agreement (1.4-2.4) between PPG and Mobil-O-Graph. Intra-class correlation (ICC) for PWV was 0.89, and the coefficient of variation (CV) was 9.2%. Conclusion: Based on the findings of the present study, we suggest that the measurement of PWV obtained from the PPG is probably a reliable one. It offers the advantages of lower cost and greater practicality about application and usage.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 220
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pulse wave analysis using the Mobil-O-Graph, Arteriograph and Complior device: a comparative study
    Benas, Dimitrios
    Kornelakis, Michalis
    Triantafyllidi, Helen
    Kostelli, Gavriela
    Pavlidis, George
    Varoudi, Maria
    Vlastos, Dimitrios
    Lambadiari, Vaia
    Parissis, John
    Ikonomidis, Ignatios
    BLOOD PRESSURE, 2019, 28 (02) : 107 - 113
  • [2] Correlation between short-term blood pressure variability parameters with mobil-O-graph pulse wave velocity
    Marco Antonio Vieira Silva
    Luiz Antonio Pertilli Rodrigues Resende
    Mateus Marchiori Vieira
    Camila Blanco Ferreira Jajah
    Lucas Alves Berzotti
    Nicole Cristine Rambourg
    Ian Dias de Souza Pierson
    João Lucas Carvalho Achkar
    Livia Marchiori Vieira
    Guilherme Marchiori Moreira
    Geisa Ribeiro Borges
    Dalmo Correia
    Clinical Hypertension, 28
  • [3] Correlation between short-term blood pressure variability parameters with mobil-O-graph pulse wave velocity
    Vieira Silva, Marco Antonio
    Pertilli Rodrigues Resende, Luiz Antonio
    Vieira, Mateus Marchiori
    Ferreira Jajah, Camila Blanco
    Berzotti, Lucas Alves
    Rambourg, Nicole Cristine
    Pierson, Ian Dias de Souza
    Carvalho Achkar, Joao Lucas
    Vieira, Livia Marchiori
    Moreira, Guilherme Marchiori
    Borges, Geisa Ribeiro
    Correia, Dalmo
    CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2022, 28 (01)
  • [4] Oscillometric pulse wave velocity estimated via the Mobil-O-Graph shows excellent accuracy in children, adolescents and young adults: an invasive validation study
    Walser, Matthias
    Schlichtiger, Jenny
    Dalla-Pozza, Robert
    Mandilaras, Guido
    Tengler, Anja
    Ulrich, Sarah
    Oberhoffer, Felix Sebastian
    Oberhoffer-Fritz, Renate
    Boehm, Birgit
    Haas, Nikolaus A.
    Jakob, Andre
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2023, 41 (04) : 597 - 607
  • [5] Unreliable Estimation of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Provided by the Mobil-O-Graph Algorithm-Based System in Marfan Syndrome
    Salvi, Paolo
    Furlanis, Giulia
    Grillo, Andrea
    Pini, Alessandro
    Salvi, Lucia
    Marelli, Susan
    Rovina, Matteo
    Moretti, Francesco
    Gaetano, Raffaella
    Pintassilgo, Ines
    Faini, Andrea
    Fabris, Bruno
    Carretta, Renzo
    Parati, Gianfranco
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2019, 8 (09):
  • [6] Pulse wave velocity in South African women and children: comparison between the Mobil-O-Graph and SphygmoCor XCEL devices
    Kolkenbeck-Ruh, Andrea
    Soepnel, Larske Marit
    Kim, Andrew Wooyoung
    Naidoo, Sanushka
    Smith, Wayne
    Davies, Justine
    Ware, Lisa Jayne
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2022, 40 (01) : 65 - 75
  • [7] Reference values of office central blood pressure, pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index recorded by means of the Mobil-O-Graph PWA monitor
    Paiva, Annelise M. G.
    Mota-Gomes, Marco A.
    Brandao, Andrea A.
    Silveira, Fabio S.
    Silveira, Marcos S.
    Okawa, Rogerio T. P.
    Feitosa, Audes D. M.
    Sposito, Andrei C.
    Nadruz Jr, Wilson
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2020, 43 (11) : 1239 - 1248
  • [8] Novel Methods for Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement
    Pereira, Tania
    Correia, Carlos
    Cardoso, Joao
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 35 (05) : 555 - 565
  • [9] A Magnetic Plethysmograph Probe for Local Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement
    Nabeel, P. M.
    Joseph, Jayaraj
    Sivaprakasam, Mohanasankar
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2017, 11 (05) : 1065 - 1076
  • [10] Measurement of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity With a Connected Bathroom Scale
    Campo, David
    Khettab, Hakim
    Yu, Roger
    Genain, Nicolas
    Edouard, Paul
    Buard, Nadine
    Boutouyrie, Pierre
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 30 (09) : 876 - 883