The transportal technique shows better clinical results than the transtibial techniques for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

被引:25
作者
Ro, Kyung-Han [1 ]
Kim, Hyun-Jung [2 ]
Lee, Dae-Hee [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Samsung Med Ctr, Sch Med, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Dept Prevent Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Anteromedial portal; Transportal; Transtibial; Clinical outcome; ANTEROMEDIAL PORTAL TECHNIQUE; FEMORAL TUNNEL POSITION; TERM FOLLOW-UP; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; DRILLING TECHNIQUES; TIBIAL TUNNEL; PLACEMENT; KINEMATICS; HAMSTRINGS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-017-4786-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Although anatomical and independent drilling techniques, such as transportal (TP) technique, have become more popular in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the TP technique has not been shown to yield superior clinical or functional outcomes compared to the transtibial (TT) technique. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to compare clinical outcomes of the TP and TT techniques, as determined by patient-reported outcome scores and knee joint laxity tests. It was hypothesized that the TP and TT techniques of ACL reconstruction would yield similar patient-reported functional outcomes and similar results on knee joint laxity tests. Studies were included if they reported at least one of the following clinical outcomes: IKDC score, IKDC examination, Lysholm knee score, and Tegner activity score. Knee stability was evaluated by single or multiple parameters of the following knee laxity examinations: the Lachman test, the pivot shift test, and side-to-side difference on the instrumented knee laxity test. Sixteen studies were finally included in this meta-analysis. The proportions of patients with normal grade on the IKDC examination [odds ratio (OR) 2.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-3.53; P = 0.0006] and Lysholm score (mean difference 1.27; 95% CI 0.23-2.31; P = 0.02) after surgery were higher with the TP than with the TT technique, but there were no differences in IKDC and Tegner scores. The postoperative proportion of normal knee joint stability was significantly higher with the TP than the TT technique, on both Lachman (OR 2.29; 95% CI 1.35-3.92; P = 0.002) and pivot shift (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.12-4.05; P = 0.02) tests. The pooled mean side-to-side difference was 0.73 mm lower with the TP than the TT technique (95% CI - 1.14 to - 0.32 mm; P = 0.0005). This meta-analysis showed that the clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction were better with the TP than the TT technique, both on knee functional outcome scales and knee laxity tests. The findings thus suggest that the TP technique would be a better option for single-bundle ACL reconstruction compared to the TT technique. III.
引用
收藏
页码:2371 / 2380
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Femoral Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction An In Vivo Imaging Analysis Comparing Transtibial and 2-Incision Tibial Tunnel-Independent Techniques
    Abebe, Ermias S.
    Moorman, C. T., III
    Dziedzic, T. Scott
    Spritzer, Charles E.
    Cothran, R. Lee
    Taylor, Dean C.
    Garrett, William E., Jr.
    DeFrate, Louis E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (10) : 1904 - 1911
  • [2] Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up
    Alentorn-Geli, Eduard
    Samitier, Gonzalo
    Alvarez, Pedro
    Steinbacher, Gilbert
    Cugat, Ramon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 34 (05) : 747 - 754
  • [3] A comparison of the anteromedial and transtibial drilling technique in ACL reconstruction after a short-term follow-up
    Azboy, Ibrahim
    Demirtas, Abdullah
    Gem, Mehmet
    Kiran, Seymuz
    Alemdar, Celil
    Bulut, Mehmet
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2014, 134 (07) : 963 - 969
  • [4] An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices
    Chechik, Ofir
    Amar, Eyal
    Khashan, Morsi
    Lador, Ran
    Eyal, Gil
    Gold, Aviram
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (02) : 201 - 206
  • [5] Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation
    Dargel, Jens
    Schmidt-Wiethoff, Ruediger
    Fischer, Soren
    Mader, Konrad
    Koebke, Juergen
    Schneider, Thomas
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2009, 17 (03) : 220 - 227
  • [6] Clinical and three-dimensional computed tomographic comparison between ACL transportal versus ACL transtibial single-bundle reconstructions with hamstrings
    de Abreu-e-Silva, Guilherme Moreira
    Baumfeld, Daniel Soares
    Ribeiro Bueno, Elton Luis
    Pfeilsticker, Rudolf Moreira
    Percope de Andrade, Marco Antonio
    Nunes, Tarcizo Afonso
    [J]. KNEE, 2014, 21 (06) : 1203 - 1209
  • [7] Di Benedetto Paolo, 2016, Knee Surg Relat Res, V28, P319, DOI 10.5792/ksrr.16.007
  • [8] Anteromedial Portal Versus Transtibial Drilling Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Any Clinical Relevance? A Retrospective Comparative Study
    Franceschi, Francesco
    Papalia, Rocco
    Rizzello, Giacomo
    Del Buono, Angelo
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (08) : 1330 - 1337
  • [9] Prospective Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Conventional Single-Bundle, Anatomic Single-Bundle, and Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction 281 Cases With 3-to 5-Year Follow-up
    Hussein, Mohsen
    van Eck, Carola F.
    Cretnik, Andrej
    Dinevski, Dejan
    Fu, Freddie H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (03) : 512 - 520
  • [10] Kang Seo Goo, 2017, Knee Surg Relat Res, V29, P33, DOI 10.5792/ksrr.16.053