Governance, Governance Models and Port Performance: A Systematic Review

被引:42
作者
Borges Vieira, Guilherme Bergmann [1 ,2 ]
Kliemann Neto, Francisco Jose [2 ]
Amaral, Fernando Goncalves [2 ]
机构
[1] UCS, Ctr Ciencias Sociais CCSO, BR-95070560 Caxias Do Sul, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, PPGEP, BR-90035190 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
systematic review; governance; ports; performance; models; PATH DEPENDENCE; INNOVATION; SEAPORTS; PRIVATIZATION; AUTHORITIES; MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1080/01441647.2014.946458
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Studies on ports as business clusters and governance of the different actors in the port logistics chain are rapidly developing. In this context, one emerging topic concerns the analysis of governance models and their relationship with port performance. The present study is a systematic review of port governance that aims to describe the evolution of research on this topic between 1992 and 2013, identifying the governance models developed from this research and analysing the main characteristics of these models and their contribution to port performance. The results indicated that port governance studies remain incipient and follow a predominantly qualitative approach based on case studies and conceptual works. Regarding governance models and their relationship with port performance, although some models have been observed in the literature, the study of this subject has yet to be developed, and the relationship between governance models and port performance remains inconclusive. Although the existing models make a contribution, they allow gaps in terms of evaluating governance outcomes, identifying governance elements and discussing governance actions. These gaps make it hard to answer the basic questions associated with governance models: Who governs? What is governed? How is it governed? and For what is it governed?
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 662
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], RES TRANSPORTATION E
  • [2] [Anonymous], RES TRANSPORTATION E
  • [3] Baird A J., 2006, Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance, P55
  • [4] Baltazar R., 2006, Research in Transportation Economics, V17, P379, DOI [10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17017-1, DOI 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17017-1]
  • [5] Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003
    Becheikh, N
    Landry, R
    Amara, N
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2006, 26 (5-6) : 644 - 664
  • [6] Bichou K., 2006, Research in Transportation Economics, V17, P567, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17024-9
  • [7] Brooks M., 2006, Research in Transportation Economics, V17, issue, P405, DOI [/10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17018-3, DOI 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17018-3, 10.1016/S0739-8859, DOI 10.1016/S0739-8859]
  • [8] Brooks M.R., 2008, MARIT POLICY MANAG, V35, P411, DOI [DOI 10.1080/03088830802215060, 10.1080/03088830802215060]
  • [9] Brooks M. R., 2007, RES TRANSP ECON, V17, P237, DOI [10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17011-0, DOI 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17011-0]
  • [10] Regional port authorities: leading players in innovation networks?
    Cahoon, Stephen
    Pateman, Hilary
    Chen, Shu-Ling
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 27 : 66 - 75