Probability of Major Depression Classification Based on the SCID, CIDI, and MINI Diagnostic Interviews: A Synthesis of Three Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses

被引:25
作者
Wu, Yin [1 ,2 ]
Levis, Brooke [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Ioannidis, John P. A. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Benedetti, Andrea [3 ,9 ,10 ]
Thombs, Brett D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,9 ,10 ,11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Jewish Gen Hosp, Lady Davis Inst Med Res, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Keele Univ, Sch Primary Community & Social Care, Ctr Prognosis Res, Keele, Staffs, England
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[7] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[8] Stanford Univ, Dept Stat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[9] McGill Univ Hlth Ctr, Resp Epidemiol & Clin Res Unit, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[10] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[11] McGill Univ, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[12] McGill Univ, Dept Educ & Counselling Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Depressive disorders; Diagnostic interviews; Individual participant data meta-analysis; Major depression; Classification; HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE-9 PHQ-9; PRIMARY-CARE; VALIDITY; ACCURACY; CLINIMETRICS; SCHEDULES;
D O I
10.1159/000509283
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Introduction: Three previous individual participant data meta-analyses (IPDMAs) reported that, compared to the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM (SCID), alternative reference standards, primarily the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), tended to misclassify major depression status, when controlling for depression symptom severity. However, there was an important lack of precision in the results. Objective: To compare the odds of the major depression classification based on the SCID, CIDI, and MINI. Methods: We included and standardized data from 3 IPDMA databases. For each IPDMA, separately, we fitted binomial generalized linear mixed models to compare the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of major depression classification, controlling for symptom severity and characteristics of participants, and the interaction between interview and symptom severity. Next, we synthesized results using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis. Results: In total, 69,405 participants (7,574 [11%] with major depression) from 212 studies were included. Controlling for symptom severity and participant characteristics, the MINI (74 studies; 25,749 participants) classified major depression more often than the SCID (108 studies; 21,953 participants; aOR 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.92]). Classification odds for the CIDI (30 studies; 21,703 participants) and the SCID did not differ overall (aOR 1.19; 95% CI 0.79-1.75); however, as screening scores increased, the aOR increased less for the CIDI than the SCID (interaction aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.52-0.80). Conclusions: Compared to the SCID, the MINI classified major depression more often. The odds of the depression classification with the CIDI increased less as symptom levels increased. Interpretation of research that uses diagnostic interviews to classify depression should consider the interview characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 40
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5, V5th, DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental disorders: DSM-5TM, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V4th
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, ICD 10 CLASSIFICATIO
[5]  
ANTHONY JC, 1985, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V42, P667
[6]  
APA American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSMIV-TR
[7]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[8]   Diagnosing depression in the medically ill: validity of a lay-administered structured diagnostic interview [J].
Booth, BM ;
Kirchner, JE ;
Hamilton, G ;
Harrell, R ;
Smith, GR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (06) :353-360
[9]   A difference that matters: comparisons of structured and semi-structured psychiatric diagnostic interviews in the general population [J].
Brugha, TS ;
Bebbington, PE ;
Jenkins, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1999, 29 (05) :1013-1020
[10]   A general population comparison of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) [J].
Brugha, TS ;
Jenkins, R ;
Taub, N ;
Meltzer, H ;
Bebbington, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2001, 31 (06) :1001-1013