Therapeutic alliance as a mediator of change: A systematic review and evaluation of research

被引:236
作者
Baier, Allison L. [1 ]
Kline, Alexander C. [1 ,2 ]
Feeny, Norah C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, PTSD Treatment & Res Program, 11220 Bellflower Rd, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] VA San Diego Healthcare Syst, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr,MC116B, San Diego, CA 92161 USA
关键词
Alliance; Mediator; Mechanism; Psychotherapy; Systematic review; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; WORKING ALLIANCE; PROLONGED EXPOSURE; BETWEEN-PERSON; WITHIN-PERSON; EXPLORING MECHANISMS; OUTCOME CORRELATION; BULIMIA-NERVOSA; COMMON FACTORS; PSYCHOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101921
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The alliance-outcome relationship has been consistently linked to positive treatment outcomes irrespective of psychotherapy modality. However, beyond its general links to favorable treatment outcomes, it is less clear whether the alliance is a specific mediator of change and thus a possible mechanism underlying psychotherapy response. This systematic review evaluated research examining the alliance as a potential mediator of symptom change, reviewing study characteristics of 37 relevant articles examining the alliance-outcome relationship and the extent to which these studies met recommended criteria for mechanistic research. Alliance mediated ther-apeutic outcomes in 70.3% of the studies. We observed significant heterogeneity across studies in terms of methodology, including timing of alliance assessment, study design, constructs used in mediation models, and analytic approaches. Building on recent methodological advancements, we propose directions for future research examining the putative mediational role of alliance, such as greater uniformity in and attention to study design and statistical methodology. This review highlights the importance of alliance in therapeutic change and discusses how adhering to requirements for process research will improve our ability to more precisely estimate how and to what extent alliance drives therapeutic change.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]  
Alexander L.B., 1986, The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook, P325
[2]   DECOMPOSITION OF EFFECTS IN PATH ANALYSIS [J].
ALWIN, DF ;
HAUSER, RM .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1975, 40 (01) :37-47
[3]   Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: Exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance [J].
Baldwin, Scott A. ;
Wampold, Bruce E. ;
Imel, Zac E. .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 75 (06) :842-852
[4]   Alliance predicts patients' outcome beyond in-treatment change in symptoms [J].
Barber, JP ;
Connolly, MB ;
Crits-Christoph, P ;
Gladis, L ;
Siqueland, L .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 68 (06) :1027-1032
[5]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[6]   Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations [J].
Bauer, Daniel J. ;
Preacher, Kristopher J. ;
Gil, Karen M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2006, 11 (02) :142-163
[7]   Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories-IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients [J].
Beck, AT ;
Steer, RA ;
Ball, R ;
Ranieri, WF .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1996, 67 (03) :588-597
[8]  
Bordin ES., 1979, Psychother Theory Res Pract, V16, P252, DOI [10.1037/h0085885, DOI 10.1037/H0085885]
[9]  
Bordin H., 1994, THE WORKING ALLIANCE, P13, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0085885
[10]   Does the Working Alliance Mediate the Effect of Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) and Alliance Feedback on Psychotherapy Outcomes? A Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Brattland, Heidi ;
Koksvik, John Morten ;
Burkeland, Olav ;
Klockner, Christian A. ;
Lara-Cabrera, Mariela Loreto ;
Miller, Scott D. ;
Wampold, Bruce ;
Ryum, Truls ;
Iversen, Valentina Cabral .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 66 (02) :234-246