COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES AND INDUSTRY EVOLUTION: THE BENEFITS OF MAKING MISTAKES IN THE FLAT PANEL DISPLAY INDUSTRY

被引:54
作者
Eggers, J. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Stern Sch Business, Dept Management & Org, New York, NY 10012 USA
关键词
competing technologies; pre-entry experience; technological evolution; organizational inertia; flat panel displays; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; CAPABILITIES; ENTRY; ADVANTAGE; INNOVATION; DYNAMICS; INERTIA; QUALITY; PERFORMANCE; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1002/smj.2129
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article investigates the post-entry implications of pre-entry technological choices made during the uncertain period before a dominant design. Building on work on technological dynamics and organizational inertia, I argue that too early commitments to the winning technology may impede the ability to bring the best product to market, but delaying investment too long limits the ability to accumulate useful knowledge. Using data from the evolution of the flat panel display industry from 1965 to 2005, the study shows empirical support for the two theoretical mechanisms and offers the surprising result that firms starting in the losing technology before switching outperform other firms in terms of product value. Switching, while difficult behaviorally in recovering from failure, both delays difficult-to-reverse technological commitments and develops market knowledge. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 178
页数:20
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   The conditioning effect of time on firm survival: An industry life cycle approach [J].
Agarwal, R ;
Sarkar, M ;
Echamebadi, R .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 45 (05) :971-994
[2]   COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES, INCREASING RETURNS, AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS [J].
ARTHUR, WB .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (394) :116-131
[3]   The role of pre-entry experience, entry timing, and product technology strategies in explaining firm survival [J].
Bayus, Barry L. ;
Agarwal, Rajshree .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (12) :1887-1902
[4]   Deconstructing the pioneer's advantage: Examining vintage effects and consumer valuations of quality and variety [J].
Bohlmann, JD ;
Golder, PN ;
Mitra, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (09) :1175-1195
[5]   Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries [J].
Christensen, CM ;
Suárez, FF ;
Utterback, JM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (12) :S207-S220
[6]  
Christensen CM, 1996, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V17, P197, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199603)17:3<197::AID-SMJ804>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-U
[8]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152
[9]   Churn, baby, churn: Strategic dynamics among dominant and fringe firms in a segmented industry [J].
de Figueiredo, John M. ;
Silverman, Brian S. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (04) :632-650
[10]   ASSET STOCK ACCUMULATION AND SUSTAINABILITY OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
DIERICKX, I ;
COOL, K .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 35 (12) :1504-1511