Better Product Quality May Lead to Lower Product Price

被引:27
作者
Chenavaz, Regis [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, AMSE, KEDGE Business Sch, Rue Antoine Bourdelle, F-13288 Marseille, France
[2] EHESS, Rue Antoine Bourdelle, F-13288 Marseille, France
来源
B E JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL ECONOMICS | 2017年 / 17卷 / 01期
关键词
price-quality relationship; dynamic pricing; product quality; product innovation; quality-based cost; optimal control; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; PROCESS INNOVATION; MONOPOLY; SIGNALS; CONSEQUENCES; DYNAMICS; DEMAND; MODELS;
D O I
10.1515/bejte-2015-0062
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article analyzes the conditions under which better product quality implies higher or lower product price. In an optimal control framework, I make the following assumptions: The firm sets the dynamic pricing and product innovation policies; product innovation raises quality, which drives production cost, and consumers are sensitive to price and quality. I derive a rule of price-quality relationship that stresses the influence of quality on price through the effects of cost (positive), sales (negative), and markup (positive). This article shows that, while maximizing profit and despite a quality and cost increases, the firm may decrease product prices because of the possibility of generating more sales as a result of combining better quality with lower price. This sales effect solves the puzzle of a negative price-quality relationship. More generally, the sales effect mitigates the ability of price to convey information about quality.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Monopoly and product quality - Separating or pooling menu?
    Acharyya, R
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1998, 61 (02) : 187 - 194
  • [2] Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation
    Adner, R
    Levinthal, D
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (05) : 611 - 628
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, DIFFERENTIAL GAMES E
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SORMS.2015.03.001
  • [5] BAGWELL K, 1991, AM ECON REV, V81, P224
  • [6] Bayus B. L., 1995, Journal of Operations Management, V12, P173, DOI 10.1016/0272-6963(94)00017-9
  • [7] Caulkins J. P., 2015, Technical Report Research Report 2015-05
  • [8] Chatterjee R, 2009, HANDBOOK OF PRICING RESEARCH IN MARKETING, P169
  • [9] Chenavaz R., 2011, J EC STUDIES RES, V10, DOI 10.2011.283
  • [10] Chenavaz R, 2011, ECON BULL, V31, P2229