Mentor support systems in a doctoral mentoring program

被引:8
作者
Geesa, Rachel Louise [1 ]
McConnell, Kat R. [2 ]
Elam, Nicholas Patrick [1 ]
Clark, Ellie [3 ]
机构
[1] Ball State Univ, Dept Educ Leadership, Muncie, IN 47306 USA
[2] Marquette Univ, Dept Counselor Educ & Counseling Psychol, Milwaukee, WI 53233 USA
[3] Ball State Univ, Dept Counseling Psychol Social Psychol & Counseli, Muncie, IN 47306 USA
关键词
Mentoring; Doctoral program; EdD; Education doctorate; Mentor perspectives; Scholar-practitioners; PEER; STUDENTS; EDUCATION; CAREER; PHD;
D O I
10.1108/SGPE-10-2019-0081
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose Education doctoral (EdD) students (mentees) typically hold full-time leadership positions in education-related fields while completing their degree. The types of support these scholar-practitioners need is unique because of their focus on balancing full-time work, academic, and personal needs. This study aims to explore mentor support systems for mentees in their first and second year of the EdD program through a group mentoring program, which is designed to provide resources and access to mentors to promote successful degree completion in five years or less. Design/methodology/approach Mentors participated in monthly presentations and discussions with mentees throughout the 2018-2019 academic year, which were video recorded. At the end of the academic year, mentors partook in an interview or focus group meeting. Findings Themes emerged related to mentors' focus on the dissertation process; emphasis on outreach for support; discussions and work/life balance; selection of presentation topics; perceptions of networking opportunities with mentees; desire to build stronger connections with mentees; and concerns/opinions about the mentoring format. Research limitations/implications The design of a mentoring program for EdD mentees varies throughout the doctorate degree pathway. Mentors support mentees in their doctoral journey through presentations and discussions about relevant topics during their first two years in the doctoral program. Additional studies are needed regarding EdD mentoring programs for students in the third year to the completion of the degree. Originality/value Few studies exist related to mentoring programs for scholar-practitioners in EdD programs. Results from this research provide EdD faculty and advisors insights to group mentoring and discussion topics for first and second year EdD students, based on the mentors' perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 327
页数:17
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Anderson R.D., 2017, NASSP BULL, V101, P278, DOI DOI 10.1177/0192636517743566
  • [2] Black R., 2017, J LEARNING HIGHER ED, V13, P1
  • [3] Booth S., 2016, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, V11, P383, DOI [DOI 10.28945/3603, https://doi.org/10.28945/3603]
  • [4] Redefining the EdD: Seeking a Separate Identity
    Boyce, Barbara Ann
    [J]. QUEST, 2012, 64 (01) : 24 - 33
  • [5] Brown R D., 2020, Higher Learning Research Communications, V10, P20, DOI DOI 10.18870/HLRC.V10I2.1188
  • [6] Why do students consider dropping out of doctoral degrees? Institutional and personal factors
    Castello, Montserrat
    Pardo, Marta
    Sala-Bubare, Anna
    Sune-Soler, Nuria
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 74 (06) : 1053 - 1068
  • [7] Roles, Risks, and Benefits of Peer Mentoring Relationships in Higher Education
    Colvin, Janet W.
    Ashman, Marinda
    [J]. MENTORING & TUTORING, 2010, 18 (02): : 121 - 134
  • [8] Mentoring College Students: A Critical Review of the Literature Between 1990 and 2007
    Crisp, Gloria
    Cruz, Irene
    [J]. RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 50 (06) : 525 - 545
  • [9] Navigating the lonely sea: peer mentoring and collaboration among aspiring women scholars
    Driscoll, Lisa G.
    Parkes, Kelly A.
    Tilley-Lubbs, Gresilda A.
    Brill, Jennifer M.
    Bannister, Vanessa R. Pitts
    [J]. MENTORING & TUTORING, 2009, 17 (01): : 5 - 21
  • [10] Evaluating a Psychology Graduate Student Peer Mentoring Program
    Fleck, Christina
    Mullins, Morell E.
    [J]. MENTORING & TUTORING, 2012, 20 (02): : 271 - 290