SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSIDERATION OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN TURKEY

被引:0
|
作者
Olhan, E. [1 ]
Demirdogen, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Econ, TR-06110 Ankara, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY | 2019年 / 20卷 / 02期
关键词
socio-economic consideration; GMO; import decision; Turkey; BIOSAFETY; PROTOCOL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Modern biotechnology has found its largest area of utilisation in the agricultural sector. The structures of conventional culture types and their wild relatives are modified to produce a high amount of quality crops. Cultivation area of Genetically modified organisms (GMOs), whose production has started in 1996, has multiplied more than 110 times; from 1.7 million ha to 185.1 million ha in 2016. Taking necessary steps by defining the disadvantages of modern biotechnology on biodiversity, human health, and social structure requires the 'Biosafety System'. Biosafety is defined as the guarantee for the safe use of biotechnology. Biosafety is a concept covering the risk assessment and risk management. Risk assessment consists of scientific risk assessment and socio-economic consideration. In some cases, scientific risk assessment may be insufficient in risk management and at this point, socio-economic consideration gains importance. The first binding legal document on a global scale regarding the international movement of the GMOs, Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB) grants the countries the right to consider the socio-economic costs in the approval process of GMOs import. However, the number of countries performing the socio-economic evaluation in this process is limited. Up to now, 35 countries have included socio-economic evaluation in their national biosafety regulations. Even though it is not in the literature yet, with the Law on Biosafety legalised in 2010, Turkey has become one of the countries that make socio-economic evaluation obligatory in GMO market launch. This study has focused on why and how the socio-economic evaluation, which is mandatory before authorising the import of GM agricultural products, should be conducted.
引用
收藏
页码:1010 / 1021
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Socio-Economic Factors Affecting Early Childhood Health: the Case of Turkey
    Karaoglan, Deniz
    Saracoglu, Durdane Sirin
    CHILD INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2018, 11 (03) : 1051 - 1075
  • [22] The impact of socio-economic factors on food away home consumption in Turkey
    Akdemir, Sinasi
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (3-4): : 115 - 118
  • [23] Impact of Some Socio-economic Factors on Higher Education Participation in Turkey
    Ekinci, C. Ergin
    EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2011, 36 (160): : 281 - 297
  • [24] Regional differences in intelligence, income and other socio-economic variables in Turkey
    Lynn, Richard
    Sakar, Caner
    Cheng, Helen
    INTELLIGENCE, 2015, 50 : 144 - 149
  • [25] Socio-economic inequalities in overweight among adults in Turkey: a regional evaluation
    Ergin, Isil
    Hassoyl, Hur
    Kunst, Anton
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2012, 15 (01) : 58 - 66
  • [26] Socio-economic analysis of dairy buffalo enterprises in Afyonkarahisar province in Turkey
    Gunlu, Aytekin
    Cicek, Hasan
    Tandogan, Murat
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 8 (3-4): : 689 - 691
  • [27] The Analysis of Socio-Economic Factors in the Dairy Farming of Antalya Province of Turkey
    Ozcatalbas, Orhan
    Akcaoz, Handan
    Firat, Mehmet Ziya
    Kutlar, Ilkay
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES, 2010, 9 (01): : 20 - 26
  • [28] Spatial Analysis of the Socio-Economic Development Profile of Bilecik City, Turkey
    Akgis-Ilhan, Oznur
    Karakas, Erdal
    SOSYOEKONOMI, 2021, 29 (48) : 205 - 227
  • [29] Urban Consumer's Attitudes Toward Genetically Modified Organisms and Foods in Turkey
    Haspolat Kaya, Iraz
    Konar, Nevzat
    Artik, Nevzat
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES-TARIM BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2014, 20 (01): : 71 - 82
  • [30] Attitudes of consumers toward the effects of genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The example of Turkey
    Oguz, Ozdemir
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (3-4): : 159 - 165