Conditions for void formation in friction stir welding from machine learning

被引:64
作者
Du, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Mukherjee, Tuhin [1 ]
DebRoy, Tarasankar [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Tianjin Univ, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Tianjin Key Lab Adv Joining Technol, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
关键词
MATERIAL FLOW; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; 3-DIMENSIONAL HEAT; PEAK TEMPERATURE; DEFECT FORMATION; ALUMINUM-ALLOY; NEURAL-NETWORK; PLASTIC-FLOW; PREDICTION; FORCE;
D O I
10.1038/s41524-019-0207-y
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Friction stir welded joints often contain voids that are detrimental to their mechanical properties. Here we investigate the conditions for void formation using a decision tree and a Bayesian neural network. Three types of input data sets including unprocessed welding parameters and computed variables using an analytical and a numerical model of friction stir welding were examined. One hundred and eight sets of independent experimental data on void formation for the friction stir welding of three aluminum alloys, AA2024, AA2219, and AA6061, were analyzed. The neural network-based analysis with welding parameters, specimen and tool geometries, and material properties as input predicted void formation with 83.3% accuracy. When the potential causative variables, i.e., temperature, strain rate, torque, and maximum shear stress on the tool pin were computed from an approximate analytical model of friction stir welding, 90 and 93.3% accuracies of prediction were obtained using the decision tree and the neural network, respectively. When the same causative variables were computed from a rigorous numerical model, both the neural network and the decision tree predicted void formation with 96.6% accuracy. Among these four causative variables, the temperature and maximum shear stress showed the maximum influence on void formation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Investigation on the Effects of Process Parameters on Defect Formation in Friction Stir Welded Samples Via Predictive Numerical Modeling and Experiments [J].
Ajri, Abhishek ;
Shin, Yung C. .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2017, 139 (11)
[2]   Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian finite element modeling of friction stir welding processes [J].
Al-Badour, Fadi ;
Merah, Nesar ;
Shuaib, Abdelrahman ;
Bazoune, Abdelaziz .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 213 (08) :1433-1439
[3]   A flow-partitioned deformation zone model for defect formation during friction stir welding [J].
Arbegast, William J. .
SCRIPTA MATERIALIA, 2008, 58 (05) :372-376
[4]   Load bearing capacity of tool pin during friction stir welding [J].
Arora, A. ;
Mehta, M. ;
De, A. ;
DebRoy, T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 61 (9-12) :911-920
[5]   Back-of-the-envelope calculations in friction stir welding - Velocities, peak temperature, torque, and hardness [J].
Arora, A. ;
DebRoy, T. ;
Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 2011, 59 (05) :2020-2028
[6]   Toward optimum friction stir welding tool shoulder diameter [J].
Arora, A. ;
De, A. ;
DebRoy, T. .
SCRIPTA MATERIALIA, 2011, 64 (01) :9-12
[7]   Strains and strain rates during friction stir welding [J].
Arora, A. ;
Zhang, Z. ;
De, A. ;
DebRoy, T. .
SCRIPTA MATERIALIA, 2009, 61 (09) :863-866
[8]   Relationship between base metal properties and friction stir welding process parameters [J].
Balasubramanian, V. .
MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2008, 480 (1-2) :397-403
[9]   On the extraction of rules in the identification of bearing defects in rotating machinery using decision tree [J].
Boumahdi, Mouloud ;
Dron, Jean-Paul ;
Rechak, Said ;
Cousinard, Olivier .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (08) :5887-5894
[10]   Defect prediction as a multiobjective optimization problem [J].
Canfora, Gerardo ;
De Lucia, Andrea ;
Di Penta, Massimiliano ;
Oliveto, Rocco ;
Panichella, Annibale ;
Panichella, Sebastiano .
SOFTWARE TESTING VERIFICATION & RELIABILITY, 2015, 25 (04) :426-459