Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking?

被引:34
|
作者
Buldt, Andrew K. [1 ,2 ]
Murley, George S. [1 ,2 ]
Levinger, Pazit [3 ]
Menz, Hylton B. [2 ]
Nester, Christopher J. [4 ]
Landorf, Karl B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Discipline Podiatry, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Lower Extrem & Gait Studies Program, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[3] Victoria Univ, Inst Sport Exercise & Act Living, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia
[4] Univ Salford, Sch Hlth Sci, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
NORMATIVE VALUES; RELIABILITY; JOINT; MOTION; INDEX; SUBTALAR; GAIT; ARCH;
D O I
10.1186/s13047-015-0122-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is uncertainty as to which foot posture measures are the most valid in terms of predicting kinematics of the foot. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of clinical measures of static foot posture and mobility with foot kinematics during barefoot walking. Method: Foot posture and mobility were measured in 97 healthy adults (46 males, 51 females; mean age 24.4 +/- 6.2 years). Foot posture was assessed using the 6-item Foot Posture Index (FPI), Arch Index (AI), Normalised Navicular Height (NNHt) and Normalised Dorsal Arch Height (DAH). Foot mobility was evaluated using the Foot Mobility Magnitude (FMM) measure. Following this, a five-segment foot model was used to measure tri-planar motion of the rearfoot, midfoot, medial forefoot, lateral forefoot and hallux. Peak and range of motion variables during load acceptance and midstance/propulsion phases of gait were extracted for all relative segment to segment motion calculations. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for potential confounding variables. Results: The degree of variance in peak and range of motion kinematic variables that was independently explained by foot posture measures was as follows: FPI 5 to 22 %, NNHt 6 to 20 %, AI 7 to 13 %, DAH 6 to 8 %, and FMM 8 %. The FPI was retained as a significant predictor across the most number of kinematic variables. However, the amount of variance explained by the FPI for individual kinematic variables did not exceed other measures. Overall, static foot posture measures were more strongly associated with kinematic variables than foot mobility measures and explained more variation in peak variables compared to range of motion variables. Conclusions: Foot posture measures can explain only a small amount of variation in foot kinematics. Static foot posture measures, and in particular the FPI, were more strongly associated with foot kinematics compared with foot mobility measures. These findings suggest that foot kinematics cannot be accurately inferred from clinical observations of foot posture alone.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Foot kinematics in walking on a level surface and on stairs in patients with hallux rigidus before and after cheilectomy
    Kuni, Benita
    Wolf, Sebastian Immanuel
    Zeifang, Felix
    Thomsen, Marc
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2014, 7
  • [42] Association between foot posture and tibiofemoral contact forces during barefoot walking in patients with knee osteoarthritis
    Kubo, Takanari
    Uritani, Daisuke
    Ogaya, Shinya
    Kita, Shunsuke
    Fukumoto, Takahiko
    Fujii, Tadashi
    Inagaki, Yusuke
    Tanaka, Yasuhito
    Imagita, Hidetaka
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [43] Static Foot Posture Associated With Dynamic Plantar Pressure Parameters
    Teyhen, Deydre S.
    Stoltenberg, Brian E.
    Eckard, Timothy G.
    Doyle, Peter M.
    Boland, David M.
    Feldtmann, Jess J.
    McPoil, Thomas
    Christie, Douglas S.
    Molloy, Joseph M.
    Goffar, Stephen L.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 41 (02) : 100 - 107
  • [44] Are Static Foot Posture Measures Related to Static and Dynamic Plantar Pressure Parameters?
    Kirmizi, Muge
    Sengul, Yesim Salik
    Yalcinkaya, Gamze
    Angin, Salih
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 112 (06)
  • [45] In-shoe multi-segment foot kinematics of children during the propulsive phase of walking and running
    Wegener, Caleb
    Greene, Andrew
    Burns, Joshua
    Hunt, Adrienne E.
    Vanwanseele, Benedicte
    Smith, Richard M.
    HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 39 : 200 - 211
  • [46] Clinical measures of foot posture and ankle joint dorsiflexion do not differ in adults with and without plantar heel pain
    Landorf, Karl B.
    Kaminski, Michelle R.
    Munteanu, Shannon E.
    Zammit, Gerard V.
    Menz, Hylton B.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [47] The suppression of lower leg electromyography when walking in textured foot orthoses
    Robb, Kelly A.
    Perry, Stephen D.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 242 (10) : 2367 - 2380
  • [48] Foot pronation during walking is associated to the mechanical resistance of the midfoot joint complex
    Gomes, Raphael B. O.
    Souza, Thales R.
    Paes, Bruno D. C.
    Magalhaes, Fabricio A.
    Gontijo, Bruna A.
    Fonseca, Sergio T.
    Ocarino, Juliana M.
    Resende, Renan A.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2019, 70 : 20 - 23
  • [49] Do different multi-segment foot models detect the same changes in kinematics when wearing foot orthoses?
    Klein, Tomas
    Chapman, Graham J.
    Lastovicka, Ondrej
    Janura, Miroslav
    Richards, Jim
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [50] Effects of an Anterior Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Walking Mobility in Stroke Patients: Get Up and Go and Stair Walking
    Chen, Chiung-Ling
    Teng, Ya-Ling
    Lou, Shu-Zon
    Chang, Hsin-Yi
    Chen, Fen-Fen
    Yeung, Kwok-Tak
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 95 (11): : 2167 - 2171