Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking?

被引:34
|
作者
Buldt, Andrew K. [1 ,2 ]
Murley, George S. [1 ,2 ]
Levinger, Pazit [3 ]
Menz, Hylton B. [2 ]
Nester, Christopher J. [4 ]
Landorf, Karl B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Discipline Podiatry, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Lower Extrem & Gait Studies Program, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[3] Victoria Univ, Inst Sport Exercise & Act Living, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia
[4] Univ Salford, Sch Hlth Sci, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
NORMATIVE VALUES; RELIABILITY; JOINT; MOTION; INDEX; SUBTALAR; GAIT; ARCH;
D O I
10.1186/s13047-015-0122-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is uncertainty as to which foot posture measures are the most valid in terms of predicting kinematics of the foot. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of clinical measures of static foot posture and mobility with foot kinematics during barefoot walking. Method: Foot posture and mobility were measured in 97 healthy adults (46 males, 51 females; mean age 24.4 +/- 6.2 years). Foot posture was assessed using the 6-item Foot Posture Index (FPI), Arch Index (AI), Normalised Navicular Height (NNHt) and Normalised Dorsal Arch Height (DAH). Foot mobility was evaluated using the Foot Mobility Magnitude (FMM) measure. Following this, a five-segment foot model was used to measure tri-planar motion of the rearfoot, midfoot, medial forefoot, lateral forefoot and hallux. Peak and range of motion variables during load acceptance and midstance/propulsion phases of gait were extracted for all relative segment to segment motion calculations. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for potential confounding variables. Results: The degree of variance in peak and range of motion kinematic variables that was independently explained by foot posture measures was as follows: FPI 5 to 22 %, NNHt 6 to 20 %, AI 7 to 13 %, DAH 6 to 8 %, and FMM 8 %. The FPI was retained as a significant predictor across the most number of kinematic variables. However, the amount of variance explained by the FPI for individual kinematic variables did not exceed other measures. Overall, static foot posture measures were more strongly associated with kinematic variables than foot mobility measures and explained more variation in peak variables compared to range of motion variables. Conclusions: Foot posture measures can explain only a small amount of variation in foot kinematics. Static foot posture measures, and in particular the FPI, were more strongly associated with foot kinematics compared with foot mobility measures. These findings suggest that foot kinematics cannot be accurately inferred from clinical observations of foot posture alone.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effectiveness of neuromuscular taping on pronated foot posture and walking plantar pressures in amateur runners
    Bravo Aguilar, Maria
    Abian-Vicen, Javier
    Halstead, Jill
    Gijon-Nogueron, Gabriel
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2016, 19 (04) : 348 - 353
  • [32] Tibialis posterior EMG activity during barefoot walking in people with neutral foot posture
    Murley, George S.
    Buldt, Andrew K.
    Trump, Philip J.
    Wickham, James B.
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (02) : E69 - E77
  • [33] Foot posture and function have only minor effects on knee function during barefoot walking in healthy individuals
    Buldt, Andrew K.
    Levinger, Pazit
    Murley, George S.
    Menz, Hylton B.
    Nester, Christopher J.
    Landorf, Karl B.
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2015, 30 (05) : 431 - 437
  • [34] Effects of a foot orthosis inspired by the concept of a twisted osteoligamentous plate on the kinematics of foot-ankle complex during walking: A proof of concept
    Araujo, Vanessa L.
    Souza, Thales R.
    Magalhaes, Fabricio A.
    Santos, Thiago R. T.
    Holt, Kenneth G.
    Fonseca, Sergio T.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2019, 93 : 118 - 125
  • [35] A comparison of multi-segment foot kinematics during level overground and treadmill walking
    Tulchin, Kirsten
    Orendurff, Michael
    Karol, Lori
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2010, 31 (01) : 104 - 108
  • [36] Analysis of foot kinematics during toe walking in able-bodied individuals using the Oxford Foot Model
    Lee, Wonhee
    Yoo, Beomki
    Park, Dongho
    Hong, Juntaek
    Shim, Dain
    Choi, Joongon
    Rha, Dong-wook
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 25 (08) : 833 - 839
  • [37] Effect of foot posture, foot orthoses and footwear on lower limb muscle activity during walking and running: A systematic review
    Murley, George S.
    Landorf, Karl B.
    Menz, Hylton B.
    Bird, Adam R.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2009, 29 (02) : 172 - 187
  • [38] Midfoot passive stiffness affects foot and ankle kinematics and kinetics during the propulsive phase of walking
    Magalhaes, Fabricio Anicio
    Fonseca, Sergio Teixeira
    Araujo, Vanessa Lara
    Trede, Renato Guilherme
    Oliveira, Lilian Marques
    Miranda E Castor, Camila Gomes
    Pinto, Rafael Zambelli
    Souza, Thales Rezende
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2021, 119
  • [39] Foot and ankle joint kinematics in rheumatoid arthritis cannot only be explained by alteration in walking speed
    Dubbeldam, R.
    Nene, A. V.
    Buurke, J. H.
    Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C. G. M.
    Baan, H.
    Drossaers-Bakker, K. W.
    van de Laar, M. A. F. J.
    Hermens, H.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2011, 33 (03) : 390 - 395
  • [40] Gaze and the Control of Foot Placement When Walking in Natural Terrain
    Matthis, Jonathan Samir
    Yates, Jacob L.
    Hayhoe, Mary M.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (08) : 1224 - +