Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking?

被引:34
|
作者
Buldt, Andrew K. [1 ,2 ]
Murley, George S. [1 ,2 ]
Levinger, Pazit [3 ]
Menz, Hylton B. [2 ]
Nester, Christopher J. [4 ]
Landorf, Karl B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Discipline Podiatry, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Lower Extrem & Gait Studies Program, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[3] Victoria Univ, Inst Sport Exercise & Act Living, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia
[4] Univ Salford, Sch Hlth Sci, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
NORMATIVE VALUES; RELIABILITY; JOINT; MOTION; INDEX; SUBTALAR; GAIT; ARCH;
D O I
10.1186/s13047-015-0122-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is uncertainty as to which foot posture measures are the most valid in terms of predicting kinematics of the foot. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of clinical measures of static foot posture and mobility with foot kinematics during barefoot walking. Method: Foot posture and mobility were measured in 97 healthy adults (46 males, 51 females; mean age 24.4 +/- 6.2 years). Foot posture was assessed using the 6-item Foot Posture Index (FPI), Arch Index (AI), Normalised Navicular Height (NNHt) and Normalised Dorsal Arch Height (DAH). Foot mobility was evaluated using the Foot Mobility Magnitude (FMM) measure. Following this, a five-segment foot model was used to measure tri-planar motion of the rearfoot, midfoot, medial forefoot, lateral forefoot and hallux. Peak and range of motion variables during load acceptance and midstance/propulsion phases of gait were extracted for all relative segment to segment motion calculations. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for potential confounding variables. Results: The degree of variance in peak and range of motion kinematic variables that was independently explained by foot posture measures was as follows: FPI 5 to 22 %, NNHt 6 to 20 %, AI 7 to 13 %, DAH 6 to 8 %, and FMM 8 %. The FPI was retained as a significant predictor across the most number of kinematic variables. However, the amount of variance explained by the FPI for individual kinematic variables did not exceed other measures. Overall, static foot posture measures were more strongly associated with kinematic variables than foot mobility measures and explained more variation in peak variables compared to range of motion variables. Conclusions: Foot posture measures can explain only a small amount of variation in foot kinematics. Static foot posture measures, and in particular the FPI, were more strongly associated with foot kinematics compared with foot mobility measures. These findings suggest that foot kinematics cannot be accurately inferred from clinical observations of foot posture alone.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Foot posture is associated with kinematics of the foot during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet
    Buldt, Andrew K.
    Levinger, Pazit
    Murley, George S.
    Menz, Hylton B.
    Nester, Christopher J.
    Landorf, Karl B.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2015, 42 (01) : 42 - 48
  • [2] Effect of patellofemoral pain on foot posture and walking kinematics
    Kedroff, Louise
    Holmes, Melissa N. Galea
    Amis, Andrew
    Newham, Di J.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2019, 70 : 361 - 369
  • [3] The relationship between foot posture and lower limb kinematics during walking: A systematic review
    Buldt, Andrew K.
    Murley, George S.
    Butterworth, Paul
    Levinger, Pazit
    Menz, Hylton B.
    Landorf, Karl B.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2013, 38 (03) : 363 - 372
  • [4] The Effect of Walking Speed on Foot Kinematics is Modified When Increased Pronation is Induced
    Hornestam, Joana F.
    Souza, Thales R.
    Arantes, Paula
    Ocarino, Juliana
    Silva, Paula L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 106 (06) : 419 - 426
  • [5] Relationship between static foot posture and foot mobility
    Cornwall, Mark W.
    McPoil, Thomas G.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2011, 4
  • [6] Clinical measures of static foot posture do not agree
    Langley, Ben
    Cramp, Mary
    Morrison, Stewart C.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2016, 9
  • [7] Correlating foot posture with foot mobility using a high-accuracy foot measurement system
    Alshadli, Duaa
    Chong, Albert
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (I2MTC), 2019, : 1516 - 1521
  • [8] Static Foot Posture and Mobility Associated With Postural Sway in Elderly Women Using a Three-dimensional Foot Scanner
    Saghazadeh, Mahshid
    Tsunoda, Kenji
    Soma, Yuki
    Okura, Tomohiro
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 105 (05) : 412 - 417
  • [9] Investigation of the Relationships Among Clinical Measures of Foot Posture in Individuals with and Without Pronated Foot
    Kirmizi, Muge
    Cakiroglu, Mehmet Alphan
    Sengul, Yesim Salik
    Elvan, Ata
    Simsek, Ibrahim Engin
    Angin, Salih
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 111 (06)
  • [10] Relationships between clinical measures of static foot posture and plantar pressure during static standing and walking
    Jonely, Holly
    Brismee, Jean-Michel
    Sizer, Phillip S., Jr.
    James, C. Roger
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2011, 26 (08) : 873 - 879