Sleep deprivation induced by the modified multiple platform technique:: quantification of sleep loss and recovery

被引:331
作者
Machado, RB [1 ]
Hipólide, DC [1 ]
Benedito-Silva, AA [1 ]
Tufik, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Psychobiol, BR-04024002 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
sleep deprivation; paradoxical sleep; slow wave steep; platform technique; recording;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2004.01.019
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Vigilance status was continually monitored in socially stable groups of rats exposed to the modified multiple platform (MNIP) technique for sleep deprivation. For comparison, sleep parameters were also monitored in socially isolated rats deprived of sleep by the single platform (SP) method. In all cases, sleep was continuously recorded during baseline, during 96 h of sleep deprivation and during 4 days of recovery. Both multiple- and single-platform techniques completely abolished paradoxical sleep (PS) during the deprivation period, but also resulted in significant decreases in slow wave sleep (SWS) (-31% and -37%, respectively). Unexpectedly, animals oil large platforms, which are normally intended as controls, also showed significant reductions in PS and SWS, and these effects were more pronounced in rats deprived in groups than in animals deprived in isolation. Another control preparation, rats placed on wire-mesh grids in the deprivation tank, also showed PS reduction (-39%) but no loss of SWS during the 4 test days. Paradoxical sleep rebound was observed in the first 24 h in all groups, except for grid controls. Overall, no significant differences were found between single- and multiple-platform procedures during the 4 days of deprivation. However, sleep rebound was more pronounced in MMP-deprived rats than in SP-deprived rats. Sleep loss in both control groups may reflect residual effect of stress that remain in the platform technique. These findings indicate that the MMP technique is effective ill inducing PS deprivation (PSD). However, the fact that SWS is also affected may have implications for conclusions on paradoxical sleep function based upon paradoxical sleep deprivation. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 51
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] SLEEP-WAKEFULNESS PATTERNS IN THE HELPLESS RAT
    ADRIEN, J
    DUGOVIC, C
    MARTIN, P
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1991, 49 (02) : 257 - 262
  • [2] Inter-individual differences in the effects of acute stress on the sleep-wakefulness cycle in the rat
    Bouyer, JJ
    Deminiere, JM
    Mayo, W
    LeMoal, M
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1997, 225 (03) : 193 - 196
  • [3] EVIDENCE FOR A SLEEP-PROMOTING INFLUENCE OF STRESS
    CESPUGLIO, R
    MARINESCO, S
    BAUBET, V
    BONNET, C
    ELKAFI, B
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEUROIMMUNOLOGY, 1995, 5 (02): : 145 - 154
  • [4] Changes in sleep architecture following chronic mild stress
    Cheeta, S
    Ruigt, G
    vanProosdij, J
    Willner, P
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 41 (04) : 419 - 427
  • [5] STRESS-INDUCED BY 3 PROCEDURES OF DEPRIVATION OF PARADOXICAL SLEEP
    COENEN, AML
    VANLUIJTELAAR, ELJM
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1985, 35 (04) : 501 - 504
  • [6] SLEEP - CHANGES IN THRESHOLD TO ELECTROCONVULSIVE SHOCK IN RATS AFTER DEPRIVATION OF PARADOXICAL PHASE
    COHEN, HB
    DEMENT, WC
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1965, 150 (3701) : 1318 - &
  • [7] Selective and total sleep deprivation: Effect on the sleep EEG in the rat
    Endo, T
    Schwierin, B
    Borbely, AA
    Tobler, I
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1997, 66 (2-3) : 97 - 110
  • [8] TOTAL SLEEP-DEPRIVATION IN THE RAT TRANSIENTLY ABOLISHES THE DELTA AMPLITUDE RESPONSE TO DARKNESS - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE MECHANISM OF THE NEGATIVE DELTA REBOUND
    FEINBERG, I
    CAMPBELL, IG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 70 (06) : 2695 - 2699
  • [9] PARADOXICAL SLEEP AND MEMORY STORAGE PROCESSES
    FISHBEIN, W
    GUTWEIN, BM
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL BIOLOGY, 1977, 19 (04): : 425 - 464
  • [10] PLATFORM SLEEP-DEPRIVATION AFFECTS DEEP SLOW-WAVE SLEEP IN ADDITION TO REM-SLEEP
    GRAHNSTEDT, S
    URSIN, R
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1985, 18 (03) : 233 - 239