The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support

被引:91
作者
Van de Velde, Stijn [1 ]
Kunnamo, Ilkka [2 ]
Roshanov, Pavel [3 ]
Kortteisto, Tiina [4 ]
Aertgeerts, Bert [5 ]
Vandvik, Per Olav [6 ,7 ]
Flottorp, Signe [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Serv, Ctr Informed Hlth Choices, Oslo, Norway
[2] Sci Soc Finnish Phys, Duodecim, Helsinki, Finland
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Tampere Univ Hosp, Tampere, Finland
[5] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium
[6] MAGIC Nonprofit Res & Innovat Programme, Oslo, Norway
[7] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Oslo, Norway
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Clinical computerised decision support systems; Practice Guidelines; Guideline adherence; Evidence-based medicine; Implementation; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY; PRIMARY-CARE; OF-CARE; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; FEEDBACK-SYSTEM; INTERVENTIONS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s13012-018-0772-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Computerised decision support (CDS) based on trustworthy clinical guidelines is a key component of a learning healthcare system. Research shows that the effectiveness of CDS is mixed. Multifaceted context, system, recommendation and implementation factors may potentially affect the success of CDS interventions. This paper describes the development of a checklist that is intended to support professionals to implement CDS successfully. Methods: We developed the checklist through an iterative process that involved a systematic review of evidence and frameworks, a synthesis of the success factors identified in the review, feedback from an international expert panel that evaluated the checklist in relation to a list of desirable framework attributes, consultations with patients and healthcare consumers and pilot testing of the checklist. Results: We screened 5347 papers and selected 71 papers with relevant information on success factors for guideline-based CDS. From the selected papers, we developed a 16-factor checklist that is divided in four domains, i.e. the CDS context, content, system and implementation domains. The panel of experts evaluated the checklist positively as an instrument that could support people implementing guideline-based CDS across a wide range of settings globally. Patients and healthcare consumers identified guideline-based CDS as an important quality improvement intervention and perceived the GUIDES checklist as a suitable and useful strategy. Conclusions: The GUIDES checklist can support professionals in considering the factors that affect the success of CDS interventions. It may facilitate a deeper and more accurate understanding of the factors shaping CDS effectiveness. Relying on a structured approach may prevent that important factors are missed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   One size does not fit all: evaluating an intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis [J].
Ackerman, Sara L. ;
Gonzales, Ralph ;
Stahl, Melissa S. ;
Metlay, Joshua P. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
[2]   The role of standardized data and terminological systems in computerized clinical decision support systems: Literature review and survey [J].
Ahmadian, Leila ;
van Engen-Verheul, Mariette ;
Bakhshi-Raiez, Ferishta ;
Peek, Niels ;
Cornet, Ronald ;
de Keizer, Nicolette F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2011, 80 (02) :81-93
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD002894.pub3
[4]  
[Anonymous], PRACTICAL DIABETES I
[5]   A randomized outpatient trial of a decision-support information technology tool [J].
Apkon, M ;
Mattera, JA ;
Lin, ZQ ;
Herrin, J ;
Bradley, EH ;
Carbone, M ;
Holmboe, ES ;
Gross, CP ;
Selter, JG ;
Rich, A ;
Krumholz, HM .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (20) :2388-2394
[6]   Computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals; effects on professional practice and health care outcomes [J].
Arditi, Chantal ;
Rege-Walther, Myriam ;
Wyatt, Jeremy C. ;
Durieux, Pierre ;
Burnand, Bernard .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (12)
[7]   Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings: a qualitative study [J].
Ash, Joan S. ;
Sittig, Dean F. ;
Guappone, Kenneth P. ;
Dykstra, Richard H. ;
Richardson, Joshua ;
Wright, Adam ;
Carpenter, James ;
McMullen, Carmit ;
Shapiro, Michael ;
Bunce, Arwen ;
Middleton, Blackford .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 12
[8]   GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence [J].
Balshem, Howard ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Meerpohl, Joerg ;
Norris, Susan ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :401-406
[9]  
Bates DW., 2003, J Am Med Inform Assoc
[10]   A taxonomic description of computer-based clinical decision support systems [J].
Berlin, Amy ;
Sorani, Marco ;
Sim, Ida .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2006, 39 (06) :656-667